SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    OECD Report: “Creative Destruction,” Innovation Focus Needed In Economic Crisis

    Published on 16 June 2009 @ 9:31 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    As members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) prepare to meet for their annual ministerial meeting in Paris next week, the organisation has issued a report calling for a strategic, innovation-driven response to the economic crisis.

    The document entitled Policy Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth [pdf] was prepared by Dominique Guellec and Sacha Wunsch-Vincent of the OECD Secretariat.

    The report from the Paris-based OECD offers policy suggestions and advises governments to invest in innovation to achieve long-term growth. It suggests that efforts to stimulate the economy need “to take advantage of the process of ‘creative destruction’ to accelerate structural shifts towards a stronger and more sustainable economic future.”

    Evidence suggests that the crisis has begun to affect innovation, according to the report. Research and development (R&D) is declining because it is mainly financed by cash flow, which contracts in downturns.

    “As first signs of recovery are emerging, leaders should be careful not to forget about some of the future-oriented elements of the stimulus measures and carry them out,” said Wunsch-Vincent, an OECD economist. “These future-oriented investments are not luxury but necessity to reach to the necessary levels of growth and innovation again.”

    He added that “the area of green and sustainable growth will need most attention [as] it would be a terrible waste if we do not ‘seize the moment’ to introduce some binding commitments in this area now and before we return back to normal.”

    “Next week’s OECD ministerial meeting in Paris will be crucial in this respect,” he said.

    The document was based on a questionnaire circulated by the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry to its member countries and five accession countries (Chile, Estonia, Israel, Russia and Slovenia) to take inventory of specific innovation-related initiatives that they were undertaking.

    According to the report, many of today’s leading firms such as Microsoft or Nokia were created or transformed in the “creative destruction” of economic downturns.

    The questionnaires show that current economic stimulus efforts in the OECD countries include measures directed towards investment in R&D, education, the greening of the economy, support to innovation and to small and medium-sized enterprises. Non-OECD countries are also carrying out significant economic stimulus packages.

    The report says that when it comes to measures relating to innovation and long term growth, OECD and non-OECD economies focus on: improving infrastructure; support science, R&D and innovation; invest in human capital, education and training; and promote the investment in green technologies and innovations to foster energy-efficiency and sustainable economic growth. Most countries are implementing the above measures in order to reach a new foundation for growth in the future.

    Many of the existing stimulus packages put some emphasis on deploying information and communications (ICT) infrastructure and a “networked recovery,” the report said. ICT infrastructure is seen as a tool to revive the economy through innovative services and to offer solutions to pressing social challenges.

    “The priority given to a networked recovery and broadband is very welcome, a sign that political leaders now treat ICT infrastructure on the same par as roads, trains and energy infrastructure,” Wunsch-Vincent told Intellectual Property Watch. “To prepare for the future, we need to move the debate beyond giving everybody access to a halfway decent broadband connection.”

    “Imagine,” he said “you build 50 kilometres of single lane highway in a big country – which one can only travel in one direction and at slow speeds. Would you expect great impacts? No.” Instead, he said, next generation networks with “50-100 Mb/s symmetric speeds and their use for smart infrastructures – intelligent transport, smart grid – should be the norm.”

    The report will be continually updated to reflect corrections or adjustments on ongoing stimulus packages. This exercise should help reconcile short-term stimulus measures and plans for sustainable growth. The report said more work will be needed to measure the implementation and assess the impact of the economic recovery measures.

    The OECD is developing an innovation strategy, to be presented to ministers in 2010.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. BLOG@IPJUR.COM says:

      Linkdump 2009-06-17…

      Albihns and Zacco announced today that that they have signed an agreement signifying that two of the leading IP firms in Europe will be one as of July 1st, 2009.

      OECD Report: “Creative Destruction,” Innovation Focus Needed In Economic Crisis…

    2. Josh Kay says:

      Certainly innovation is important to any economy and can be vital to recovering from an economic downturn. The suggestion mention in the article is a strong one because it not only provides for immediate opportunities but can put a region in a better position to grow and develop in the near and far future.

      The current US innovation system is under review to be reformed and it may have profound effects on the US economy. For more in the proposed reforms on the US system see, http://aminn.org/patent-legislation


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 37.72.190.116