SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    EU Says GI Products Would Benefit Asian Poor In Renewing IP Assistance

    Published on 12 June 2009 @ 8:03 am

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    BANGKOK – The European Union told Asian countries Thursday that protecting geographical indications of their products would benefit their poor, rural people as the EU is offering to renew its intellectual property cooperation with regional countries with GI enforcement as a greater element.

    “GIs are not only worth protecting because of their connection to quality, tradition and reputation. They also make a very valuable contribution to sustainable rural development,” David Lipman, head of the European Union delegation to Thailand, told a regional conference [on 11 June] in Bangkok on geographical indications (GIs) – a category of intellectual property rights that is linked to product names associated with a particular locality or characteristics.

    Lipman said studies have shown that GIs help develop rural communities as the protection ensures that foodstuffs and agricultural products are produced in a way that conserves local biodiversity. He said GI products also can boost local tourism and help create more jobs.

    The EU has offered €5.1 million euros assistance to all 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in renewing its IP cooperation with the regional grouping. Stephane Passeri, technical coordinator of the EC delegation, told Intellectual Property Watch on the sidelines of the conference that the renewed assistance would emphasise GI protection as one of the key elements.

    Passeri said assistance would cover four years as soon as all ASEAN members ratify the cooperation agreement. Thailand, an ASEAN member, for example is required by the constitution to have the Parliament approve the cooperation agreement before the Thai government could sign it with the EU.

    The renewed EU-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Cooperation Programme would be the third phase of such cooperation and the GI enforcement would become a greater element in this new phase than in the previous ones.

    Puangrat Asavapisit, director general of Thailand’s Department of Intellectual Property, told the conference that the enforcement of GI protection in the country has helped raise the price of certain agricultural products by 20 to 30 percent.

    “GIs are the right of local communities that become their marketing tools and brands,” she said.

    Since the enforcement of the Act on Protection of Geographical Indications in Thailand in April 2004, the Thai government has offered such protection to 30 items, 25 of which are Thai products while the other five are foreign, Puangrat said. She added that another 30 items are awaiting authorities’ approval.

    Violation of the protection under the Act will subject the offender to a maximum fine of 200,000 Thai baht (about US$5,880). No offence under the law carries any imprisonment term.

    Apart from Thailand, the other ASEAN members that have enacted laws to enforce GI protection in their respective countries are Vietnam, Indonesia, Laos, Cambodia and Malaysia.

    Puangrat said as an effort to promote Thai GI products in global market, Thailand applied to register one of its prominent strains of fragrant rice in the EU in 2008. She said she hoped the EU would approve the application within this year.

    Lipman told a press conference later that he would personally help speed up the registration in EU of the Tung Kula Rong-Hai Thai Hom Mali rice – named after a key rice-growing plain ‘Tung Kula Rong-Hai’ in the poor northeastern region of Thailand while ‘hom mali’ means fragrant like the smell of jasmine.

    Puangrat said by such registration in the EU, she believed that Thai rice would become more competitive in the world market.

    Lipman added that the EU has extended its GI protection to cover various categories of food and other products among EU members in addition to wines and spirits, and also to cover products from non-EU countries.

    “Let me assure you that the EU GIs system is not only restricted to the EU member states, but opened to non-EU countries on equal footing,” he said in his opening speech, adding that trend shows that more Asian countries are offering protection to GIs.

    Subohd Kumar, a GI expert from India, told the conference that his country has offered GI protection mainly to its textile products, and said in agreement with other speakers that local Indian people have benefited from such protection.

    In answering questions from participants, Pajchima Tanasanti, deputy director general of Thailand’s Department of Intellectual Property, said Thailand could consider offering GI protection to cover services in the future as the World Trade Organization Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) allows such service coverage.

    However, the current Thai law covers only products, she said. Other experts in the conference said currently no GI protection has extended to services in any country yet.

    Sinfah Tunsarawuth may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. salma chaudhuri zohir says:

      The conference was also attended by experts from South Asian countries. Will EU provide assistance to SAARC countries or south asian countries for GI protection?

    2. Sinfah Tunsarawuth says:

      Dear Salma Chaudhuri Zohir,

      I think you need to ask that question to the EU delegation in your country, or search the website of EU. The assistance programme I mention in my story is between EU and ASEAN. It does not include South Asia.

    3. bkk says:

      Does this “regional conferene” refer to ASEAN IP working group or which meeting??? And when was it held? please clarify.

    4. William New says:

      [reply from Sinfah]: The regional conference I refer to in my story has a very very long title: “FAO-EC-DIP Regional Conference on rural development and agricultural and food quality linked to geographical origin in Asia: lessons and perspectives”. That why I didn’t put the title in the story as it would take a paragraph already. FAO is Food and Agricultural Organization of UN. EC is European Commission. DIP is Department of Intellectual Property of Thailand. It took place on Thursday, 11 June 2009, in Bangkok.


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.