<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Top Level Internet Domains &#8211; To Be Or Not To Be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/06/06/new-top-level-internet-domains-to-be-or-not-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/06/06/new-top-level-internet-domains-to-be-or-not-to-be/</link>
	<description>Original news and analysis on international IP policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Berkens</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/06/06/new-top-level-internet-domains-to-be-or-not-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3179690</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Berkens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=4262#comment-3179690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dennis

The new gTLD&#039;s are about one thing, money for ICANN.

When ICANN talks about demand for the new gTLD&quot;s they are talking about demand from suppliers who want to make money running a registry, not demand from the consumers, which seems to be null.

These are the issues we blog about everyday on our blog about the domain industry, we invite you to check it out at thedomains.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis</p>
<p>The new gTLD&#8217;s are about one thing, money for ICANN.</p>
<p>When ICANN talks about demand for the new gTLD&#8221;s they are talking about demand from suppliers who want to make money running a registry, not demand from the consumers, which seems to be null.</p>
<p>These are the issues we blog about everyday on our blog about the domain industry, we invite you to check it out at thedomains.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Nilsson</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/06/06/new-top-level-internet-domains-to-be-or-not-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3179550</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Nilsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=4262#comment-3179550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s enough with TLDs. 

With hundreds of new top-level domains Internet should be more hardly to navigate. The easy way to use Internet with more TLDs should &quot;destroy&quot; the good things with Internet.

What&#039;s the reason for new TLDs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s enough with TLDs. </p>
<p>With hundreds of new top-level domains Internet should be more hardly to navigate. The easy way to use Internet with more TLDs should &#8220;destroy&#8221; the good things with Internet.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the reason for new TLDs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.ip-watch.org @ 2013-06-19 04:04:55 by W3 Total Cache -->