SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Swedish Pirate Party Set To Win Seats In EU Elections

    Published on 5 June 2009 @ 9:05 am

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    COPENHAGEN – As a candidate for the European Parliament elections on Sunday, the Swedish Pirate Party has “good chances” of winning one, two or possibly even three mandates, it says, referring to Swedish opinion polls.

    The nontraditional party would then be the third largest, after the governing Conservatives (Moderatarna) and the Social Democratic Party, Christian Engström, the Pirate Party’s vice-president and top candidate for the European Union elections, told Intellectual Property Watch. He said the Pirate Party is averaging 6-8 percent support in the polls.

    He emphasised, however, that it all depends on the Swedish voter turnout, which he said is “very low.” It was 39 percent at the previous EU election in 2004. The Pirate Party has 20 candidates for the 7 June elections, in which the German Pirate Party is also participating, he said. Sweden will elect 18 Members of Parliament.

    pirate-party-logo-gradient1The Swedish Pirate Party’s platform has three components: It wants to do away with the patent system, it wants to reform the copyright system and limit protection (“Today’s copyright terms are simply absurd. Nobody needs to make money 70 years after he is dead,” it says), and it wants to protect individual freedom from the “surveillance state.”

    If elected, Engström will start his work in Brussels by fighting the EU telecommunications reform package, which if adopted could mean that governments would be allowed to block internet access if they discover any form of illegal file sharing, he said in an interview this week.

    He will also focus on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (IPW, Enforcement, 22 April 2009), which he said is being discussed by the EU and the United States “behind the back of EU citizens.” He calls this process, which has become known because of leaked documents, a “democratic scandal.”

    chris12-by-rickard-olsson2When asked whether the Pirate Party has any non-IP agenda on issues such as health and education, Engström replies “no.” He said these issues have been around for long and other political parties do better in these areas than the Pirate Party, which has “nothing to add.” “But we [do] think we have a new and valuable perspective on intellectual property and the importance of the right to privacy,” Engström said.

    The Pirate Party does not directly have any programme related to IP and developing countries, but it says its aim of doing away with the patent system, especially on pharmaceutical products, “would save many, many lives.”

    Engström said the industry is “unbelievably immoral” when it does not allow developing countries that can afford to produce the medicines themselves do so. He also said that a reform is needed as more than 80 percent of European pharmaceutical companies’ income comes from the state. He said this is a waste of taxpayers’ money as the state gets little in return.

    Fuelled by Pirate Bay

    The Pirate Party finances its election campaign through small contributions, such as €10 per month from its 47,000 members, of whom the average age is 26-27 years. It is the third largest party in Sweden in terms of members and plans to run for office in the 2010 Swedish parliamentary elections.

    Engström said that among the many reasons why the Pirate Party has become so big in Sweden are: The FRA (National Defence Radio Establishment) law from 1 January, which allows the Swedish state to monitor all internet and telephone traffic that cross the Swedish border; the 1 April Swedish implementation of the EU IP Enforcement Directive; and the 17 April ruling against Pirate Bay, in which employees were given one year of jail and a fine for assisting the file-sharing in 33 cases (IPW, Access to Knowledge, 26 April 2009).

    Engström strongly criticised this ruling, but said Pirate Bay and the Pirate Party are two different initiatives.

    “The music industry is trying to get the court to impose a fine if The Pirate Bay continues to operate,” Anders Rydell, author of a book on The Pirate Bay, told Intellectual Property Watch. “They are even trying to get a similar fine for the internet operator of the site, but this has not yet been decided. It appears they are waiting for the conclusion of the investigation into an accusation that the judge was not objective because of his membership in several copyright organisations. This could mean that the trial has to be remade.”

    Rydell said that as the court case was unfolding, the Pirate Party grew from 10,000 to 40,000 members in “just a matter of days.” The ruling further increased the conflict between generations that the pirate issue to a large extent is reflecting, he said, adding that the case around the judge definitely did not ease the tension.

    Elections to the European Parliament will be held in the 27 EU member states between 4 and 7 June. Some 736 members of the European Parliament (MEPs) will be elected to represent some 500,000,000 Europeans, making these the biggest trans-national elections in history, according to Wikipedia.

    Tove Iren S. Gerhardsen may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Open Rights Group Newsblog : Blog Archive » Swedish Pirate Party Set To Win Seats In EU Elections says:

      [...] Source: Intellectual Property Watch [...]

    2. Copyright or Wrong » Blog Archive » Swedish Pirate Party tipped for EU win : Copyright Law and Policy - Jefferson Coulter, Seattle Attorney says:

      [...] article at Intellectual Property Watch. Liked This Article? Bookmark [...]

    3. @robotsoul says:

      I think that the Pirate Party victory could be a signal of a coming trend. Sweden is a very computer literate culture, fast broad brand is the mainstream there. As other countries catch up we could see more parties or movements emerge that call for free flows of information this video has more about the elections: http://www.newsy.com/videos/ahoy_european_parliament_sees_pirates_and_the_right

    4. Monday « Knockoff Report says:

      [...] GSA to delve deeper into counterfeit technology issues Shop owner fined for counterfeit clothes (UK) What’s Sotomayor’s Stance On Intellectual Property? Counterfeiters change identity to circumvent ban (UAE) Swedish Pirate Party Set To Win Seats In EU Elections [...]

    5. Swedish Pirate Party: A Critical Examination « Slowfox says:

      [...] Related links: The Pirate Party’s English Information Page Christian Engström of the Pirate Party writes in the Financial Times About the Swedish Pirate Party at IP Watch. [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.