SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Pandemic Flu A Top Focus Of Health Assembly, But IP Issues Unresolved

    Published on 19 May 2009 @ 3:37 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    As the world looks to the World Health Assembly for a plan of action in case of pandemic, delegates are negotiating remaining parts of a framework for pandemic influenza preparedness, and an associated model agreement for the movement of virus and vaccine-related materials.

    A procedural agreement might come as early as Tuesday afternoon, but it remains to be seen whether agreement can be reached on how to handle uncompleted work.

    The annual assembly, meeting from 18-22 May, opened Monday with pandemic influenza, climate change, and the financial crises the most cited public health threats.

    Two key IP-related areas remain on the agenda: the ongoing implementation of a global strategy on IP and innovation, and the remaining unresolved areas of an agreement on pandemic flu preparedness, which include the way intellectual property will be used in virus- and benefit-sharing.

    Discussion on counterfeit medication, another top IP issue, has been postponed for discussion at the next WHA in 2010. The WHA is the annual decision-making meeting of the World Health Organization.

    The Global Strategy and Plan of Action on Public Health, Innovation, and Intellectual Property is scheduled to be discussed [pdf] on Tuesday and Wednesday.

    Pandemic Flu Talks Ongoing

    The Intergovernmental Meeting on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (IGM), mandated to find solutions for equitable access and benefit sharing, had its final meeting from 15-16 May (IPW, WHO, 18 May 2009). At its close, several key issues remained unresolved, as bracketed text in the latest draft of the framework [pdf], though there was progress on areas of the framework related to benefit-sharing and definitions.

    Coming to the WHA with this incomplete body of work, delegates faced a decision whether to implement consensus parts of the agreement, and how to handle remaining work.

    Some developing countries were concerned that if the framework goes ahead without agreement on the whole, then key remaining elements – notably the Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA), a legally-binding document – will never be dealt with. This concern was due in part to the fact that other countries had sought over the weekend to limit the scope of the SMTA.

    But there is also clear global pressure to have some kind of action on influenza, and key aspects of the framework which have been agreed to, such as language on benefit sharing, are valuable to developing countries.

    Way Forward On Pandemic Flu?

    Nigeria, supported by developed countries, proposed at a Monday evening working group a way forward, including implementation of agreed elements and smaller, potentially informal meetings on remaining elements. The Nigerian text reads:

    “The sixty-second World Health Assembly decided to request the Director-General to work with Member States to take forward the elements of the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits on which the intergovernmental meeting (IGM) reached consensus. The assembly decided to request the director-general to support consultations among Member States on some key remaining elements, conclude outstanding issues through a select group of experts, the bureau of the IGM or through the informal process, and report to the Executive Board at its 126th session to be held in January 2010.”

    Voicing support for this proposal Monday evening were the Czech Republic on behalf of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Mexico.

    But Brazil said that the process was not yet concluded and that accepting the proposal as is would give the “false impression” that the negotiation had been concluded, and asked that talks be continued Tuesday.

    Tuesday morning, Brazil, Indonesia, and India drafted new language on the way forward that calls for a more formalised process. Drafting of this proposal was still ongoing by press time, but an early copy obtained by Intellectual Property Watch requests the director general to work with member states “to take forward the agreed parts of the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework.”

    It further asks that the director general “facilitate and support further negotiations among all member states to conclude the remaining elements, including the Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA) and its annex, and report the outcomes of such negotiations to the 126th Executive Board.” The annex of the SMTA includes definitions of terms used within the agreement, according to a source.

    Formal discussion on the issue is expected Tuesday afternoon; informal discussions among member states continue in the meanwhile.

    Meanwhile, developed countries appear to have been working behind the scenes to secure influenza medication for their populations. The Wall Street Journal reported that Austria, Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom have been making deals with pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers. The United States also is hedging its bets, but through building capacity in the vaccine manufacturing sector that will provide them with first access to the vaccines, the report said.

    US Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius on Monday downplayed pandemic anxieties to the assembly, saying that the US is “cautiously optimistic that this virus might be less severe than was first feared, based on initial reports from our close neighbour, Mexico.”

    Consumer Group Urges US, EU Cooperation; Low-Cost Medicines

    Meanwhile, the Trans-Atlantic Consumer Dialogue, a forum of US and European consumer groups, issued a resolution on pandemics calling for the US and EU governments to work with the WHO to encourage the take-up of generics and to take measures to avoid intellectual property pitfalls on the way to better access to medicines.

    The text, available here, calls for the “EU and the US government to work with the WHO to create policies that realistically address concerns over the management of intellectual property and the supply of and access to generic medicines and vaccines, notably in the context of pandemics.”

    It asks for the governments to collaborate with WHO to create patent landscape on treatments relevant to pandemic-related illnesses and an influenza patent pool, and to cooperate with the World Trade Organization and the World Intellectual Property Organization for a comprehensive assessment in of all IP-related barriers to the manufacture and distribution of medicines.

    It further asks for several measures to increase supply of generic medicines, including capacity building for generic producers, stockpiling of generics, and WHO pre-qualification without regard to IP rights on pandemic related medications (this process reviews the safety of drugs intended for purchase by UN bodies).

    Global Strategy Remains Priority

    Leslie Ramsammy of Guyana, the president of the 2008 WHA, said in his opening speech that the 2008 agreement on the global strategy and plan of action represented a “significant new tool to improve health.” The president of last year’s assembly gave the speech before handing over the presidency to this year’s president, Nimal Siripala de Silva of Sri Lanka.

    And WHO Director General Margaret Chan opened the assembly Monday by emphasising that public health requires “fair access to affordable medical products and other interventions.”

    “I urge you, in particular, to complete work under the item on public health, innovation and intellectual property,” she said. “We are so very close.”

    NGOs Press For Global Strategy Finalisation

    Seven nongovernmental organisations Monday sent a letter to WHO member states [pdf], also calling for the finalisation of outstanding areas of the global strategy and plan of action. They are: Essential Action, Health Action International, Health Gap, Knowledge Ecology International, Médecins Sans Frontières, Oxfam International, and the Third World Network.

    The letter encourages further work on progress indicators [pdf] for measuring the plan of action, and in particular to focus more on qualitative measurements. It is not just the number of policies, it says, but “the effect and the impact of these policy measures on public health” that matters. It also calls for the WHO to remember the role of civil society as a stakeholder in the implementation process.

    Meanwhile, the team dealing with the global strategy at WHO has expanded. Peter Beyer, an official with the Swiss intellectual property office, is joining the team on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property (PHI).

    Currently led by Elil Renganathan, Executive Secretary of PHI, this group is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the global strategy. Beyer has been seconded to the WHO for two years, beginning this June, according to sources.

    Kaitlin Mara may be reached at kmara@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.