SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WTO’s Lamy Continues Engagement On Intellectual Property Issues

    Published on 14 May 2009 @ 1:24 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    World Trade Organization Director General Pascal Lamy continues to be engaged on intellectual property issues as WTO members begin to revive broader trade negotiations. This week Lamy hosted the heads of the World Intellectual Property Organization and World Health Organization together, and then chaired a consultation with ambassadors on proposals to amend WTO rules on intellectual property and trade.

    The meetings were rather routine, sources said, but reflect the ongoing importance of the issues at the highest levels in Geneva.

    Lamy, who was just re-elected for another term as head of the trade body, met with WIPO Director General Francis Gurry and WHO Director General Margaret Chan on Monday.

    The meeting had been planned for some time and generally covered topics of common interest, according to sources at the institutions. No details were available on the content of the meetings, but they may have covered issues such as innovation or counterfeit medicines, including the recent flare-up over Dutch seizures of legal generic drugs shipped from India to Brazil.

    Lamy and Gurry agreed to hold regular meetings in the future, a source said.

    Gurry is making an effort to not only sharpen the technical expertise of WIPO but to move the patent body out of the strictly technical role it has filled in the past and into broader global policy. WIPO will hold a much-discussed conference on such global issues as climate change and water shortages on 13-14 July.

    Gurry is said to have proposed this week to appoint a senior official from the World Health Organization as an assistant director general at WIPO (IPW, WIPO, 13 May 2009).

    Monday also marked the first day for Antony Taubman, who moved from working on global issues at WIPO to head of the WTO IP Division.

    Chan has some critical IP issues on the plate for next week’s annual World Health Assembly. These include: the increased push to block counterfeit drugs (while keeping open the flow of generic drugs); a mandate to come up with alternative funding for research and development and address other IP issues related to public health; and pandemic influenza (which involves related patent issues).

    WTO Consultations, TRIPS Council

    Meanwhile, on Wednesday, Lamy held his third of four consultations with ambassadors of interested governments on two proposals related to the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The consultations are being held in March, April, May and June.

    One subject of the consultations is a proposal from developing countries such as Brazil and India to improve protection of rights over biodiversity. This would include an amendment to TRIPS to include a requirement to disclose the origin of genetic material in patent applications.

    The other subject is a proposal led by Europe to extend higher level protections of geographical indications enjoyed by wines and spirits to more products.

    Support for discussing these proposals in a negotiation (though not necessarily for the proposals themselves) is backed by more than 100 countries, according to proponents.

    Wednesday’s consultation was technical, not political, participants said, and mainly focussed on clarifying the proposals, such the legality. Also participating were representatives of the opposition group of countries such as Argentina, Australia, and the United States referred to as the Joint Proposal group for an alternative proposal they have offered.

    The consultations are held without prejudice to whether there is a mandate at the WTO to negotiate them or not, a source said.

    There will be a separate consultation on 20 May on a third current IP issue, a register for GI products, which members are mandated to create during the current negotiating round, launched in Doha, Qatar in 2001. The GI register special session process is chaired by Barbados Ambassador Trevor Clarke.

    The next meeting of the WTO Council on TRIPS will be held on 8-9 June. So far, the next council meeting is expected to be routine, sources said, mainly because broader negotiating issues at the WTO will not have moved by then.

    But at the last TRIPS Council meeting, on 3-4 March, a political issue erupted under the “Other Business” agenda item (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 5 March 2009). Brazil and India raised concerns about the Dutch seizures of shipments of legal generic drugs transiting from India to Brazil and other developing countries.

    The final consultation with Lamy on GI extension and the biodiversity amendment will take place in mid-June, soon after the next TRIPS Council meeting.

    New Hope for a New Way in WTO Talks

    This week also saw the first visit to the WTO of new US Trade Representative Ron Kirk, who perked up the slow-moving discussions about reviving the Doha Round negotiations that left off in December.

    Kirk suggested that new thinking is necessary to get talks moving again, though he laid out limitations on his part such as a Congress deeply resistant to domestic agriculture liberalisation. He used a metaphor of not focussing on which mode of transportation is used to get to the destination but rather focussing on what to do at the destination.

    Kirk said the focus for opening markets for least-developed countries in this round now ought to be particularly on Brazil, China, India and South Africa.

    But a representative of the US Chamber of Commerce, a Washington business lobby group, told reporters in Geneva that Kirk’s visit “was the beginning of the process of trying to find another way” to conclude the round. “I don’t think it’s feasible or realistic to pick up where they left off in December,” the Chamber source said. But the new “third way” would have to be a compromise, not radical, to get US industry support, he added.

    WTO members have been informally waiting for the US and Indian elections to be over and their new trade teams to be in place. Most of the US team is now there, but sources say US Ambassador to the WTO Peter Allgeier will be leaving soon, perhaps this summer.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.