SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    French Parliament Passes Final Internet Anti-Piracy Law; Reaction Expected

    Published on 13 May 2009 @ 7:17 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    The French Senate’s vote on Wednesday sealed the adoption by the Parliament of the controversial French HADOPI law creating a graduated punishment mechanism for alleged copyright infringement on the internet.

    The bill was adopted by an overwhelming majority of 189 in favour and 14 against. This law will modify the French intellectual property code.

    The draft law as adopted is available here (in French). Several amendments proposed Wednesday at the Senate were rejected.

    The law creates a high-level authority for the diffusion of works and the protection of rights on the internet (French acronym HADOPI). This new entity, an independent public structure, will have several missions, among which is the promotion of commercial downloading, surveillance of legal and illegal use of works, and enforcement of a “graduated response” to illegal use of works. The law was amongst French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s priorities.

    According to the draft law text, the graduated response allows two types of sanctions: a temporary suspension of internet connection, from two months to one year, or an injunction to take preventive measures such as the installation of special software that limits access to legitimate content from the internet. The latter is aimed at companies for which the connection suspension could have drastic effects, according to a summary of the law issued by the French Senate.

    The law will now be reviewed by the French constitutional court before entering into effect.

    Reaction to the bill is spreading. European Parliament Member Guy Bono (Socialist, France) said he would ask the European Commission to take the matter to the EU Court of Justice to carry out an infringement proceeding against France for lack of respect for European Community rules if the French constitutional judge did not react to the law.

    Bono is one of the authors of Amendment 138, recently adopted by the European Parliament, which prevents sanctions against internet users without a judicial ruling (IPW Burble, 6 May 2009). The European Parliament last week said it considers access to internet as a fundamental right, making the HADOPI law a direct contradiction with the EU Parliament recommendation.

    Opponents of the law insist that this measure will not foster creation or bring larger royalties to artists as intended. Opponents also doubt the applicability of such a law since the European Parliament just rejected restrictions on access to services without prior ruling by judicial authorities.

    However, French Culture and Communication Minister Christine Albanel told the Senate Wednesday that “this draft law does not undermine any fundamental right” as it is important that the rights of authors and creators also be preserved. The French government has dedicated a website explaining the draft law and promoting commercial offers for legal downloading. Albanel also said that many countries had implemented laws to prevent illegal downloading, including internet connection suspension.

    According to a US industry representative, US internet service providers do not support the outcome in France but rather prefer voluntary, bilateral negotiations with rights owners.

    Meanwhile, sources say many websites have already published ways to circumvent the HADOPI surveillance. According to French newspaper Le Monde, the internet is buzzing with tips on avoiding detection by HADOPI.

    The date of application of the law is still uncertain. A source at the French Senate said that the Ministry of Culture and Communication would issue a decree with the details on application.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. gaubelle says:

      Facist law is facist

    2. Página em Branco » Blog Archive » French Parliament Passes Final Internet Anti-Piracy Law; Reaction Expected says:

      [...] (http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/05/13/french-parliament-seals-restrictive-internet-anti-piracy-l...) [...]

    3. jz says:

      The figure from the vote in the Senate might seem overwhelming, but:

      - In Senate groups delegate their votes to a representative, which explains the high number in favour. (the socialist group in the Senate is locked-down on these issues by its “vivendist” members)

      - Senators are 343, which means that there was a huge number of abstentions.

      - It’s much lower than in first reading when it was unanimously adopted (except for the communist group who did a “combative abstention” (sic))

      - It’s a vote in a new reading after the text has been completely rejected at the end of the emergency procedure (such an event hadn’t occured since 1983)

      - In National Assembly the vote was quite close (296 vs 233)

      - The majority of Nicolas Sarkozy was locked-down under a very high political pressure, as the President took the rejection as a personal matter.

      So what lacks here is an insight on the huge political disaster this law is already, even if it was, painfully, adopted.

      60% of the French opinion is against the law (according to an IFOP poll, whre 33% only were in favor), and the opposition ranged from presidential advisor Jacques Attali to Catherine Deneuve and other actors and film-makers, as well as independent movie theaters union, independent labels, and even members (and youth) of N. Sarkozy’s majority party.

      HADOPI is stupid, inapplicable and dangerous. But it’s dead already.

      http://www.laquadrature.net/en/solemn-burial-for-hadopi-in-french-national-assembly


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.