SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

To What Extent Can Global IP Rules Be Responsive To Public Interest Demands? The Case Of The Treaty For The Visually Impaired

To what extent can global intellectual property rules address in an effective manner the needs of the most vulnerable members of society? This is the key question facing member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) as they prepare to meet next week for a diplomatic conference, in Marrakesh, that might result in the adoption of a treaty to facilitate access to copyrighted works by visually impaired persons and persons with print disabilities.


Interview With Tanja Rajić: The Impact Of EU Enlargement On Trademark Practice In Croatia

Ten years after applying for membership, Croatia is finally joining the European Union on 1 July 2013. Tanja Rajić, senior associate at PETOSEVIC, explains how six years of accession negotiations and the adoption of the acquis communautaire have affected intellectual property protection in Croatia and prepared it for becoming a member state.





Latest Comments
  • We've taken a detailed look at the Myriad decision... »
  • “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BLUEPRINT 2014-2020”by Jeon... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Inside Views
    Inside Views: Technology Essential For Green Jobs & Planet

    Published on 7 May 2009 @ 1:20 pm

    Disclaimer: the views expressed in this column are solely those of the authors and are not associated with Intellectual Property Watch. IP-Watch expressly disclaims and refuses any responsibility or liability for the content, style or form of any posts made to this forum, which remain solely the responsibility of their authors.

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By David Hirschmann, President & CEO, Global Intellectual Property Center, US Chamber of Commerce

    Recently, we commemorated two seemingly distinct causes – Earth Day and World Intellectual Property Day. For decades, the former has served to inspire awareness and appreciation for Mother Earth, while the latter has helped highlight the role of patented inventions and other protected ideas in our economy and daily lives. Increasingly, these two goals have become inextricably linked as businesses invest billions of dollars and employ thousands of scientists, engineers and other workers to develop new clean technologies that will revolutionise how we produce and use energy. So I think we need to think about these two events in a new way, as “Green Innovation Week.”

    Strong intellectual property rights are the underlying force driving innovation. America’s IP-intensive industries account for 18 million jobs, more than $5 trillion of the US gross domestic product, more than half of all US exports, and 40 percent of US economic growth. For centuries, innovation has driven economic growth – allowing America to flourish in good times and pulling us out of difficult periods. Especially during previous recessions, America has relied on the power of our ideas to help reignite the economy and put us back on the path to prosperity. Today more than ever, we need to safeguard and strengthen the system that encourages “green” research and development investments, and holds the potential of unleashing a new generation of green-collar jobs and solutions to energy and environmental challenges.

    Standing in the way of these goals, however, are serious threats to environmental innovation – a growing number of foreign governments and global activists determined to weaken intellectual property rights in areas like energy efficiency and environmental technology. Citing the current patent system as a “barrier to technology transfer,” China and India, among others, have called for unwarranted exceptions to it.

    More recently, Energy Secretary Steven Chu suggested that weakening intellectual property protections might be a suitable approach to climate change, saying, “[A]ny area like that I think is where we should work very hard in a very collaborative way – by very collaborative I mean share all intellectual property as much as possible. … But there hasn’t been a coordinated effort.”

    If such views were to become law – or find their way into a climate change agreement – they would undermine President Obama’s vision to invest in new green technologies and create up to 5 million new jobs. The successful realisation of such a promise depends, in part, on an intellectual property system that promotes risk-taking, investment and perseverance. Weakening this system would threaten incentives for small and medium firms to invest in new ideas and overcome setbacks that inevitably arise on the road towards groundbreaking innovation.

    This pro-innovation system simply cannot be bartered away. Intellectual property rights are and should continue being part of the solution to climate change, not be scapegoated as the problem and reason why we haven’t gotten there yet. And at this time of economic hardship, strong intellectual property rights are essential for developing cutting-edge inventions that will lead to recession-beating economic growth and job creation.

    In response, President Obama and Congress must address these threats and insist on protecting environmental innovation, particularly in the looming domestic climate change debate and then likely at United Nations climate change negotiations in December 2009.

    This challenge also requires the public and private sector to work together to find constructive solutions to these issues. We must work to keep providing incentives for innovative companies to turn ideas into inventions that create jobs and help us be responsible environmental stewards.

    We can all agree that it is in everyone’s interest to work with organised labour to promote and protect green jobs, and to work with environmental groups, non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders who understand intellectual property rights help promote innovation that solves the world’s most difficult energy and environmental problems. And given the uniqueness of these challenges to the developing world, our collective leadership can address the real obstacles to technology access issues, such as lack of infrastructure, weak legal and regulatory regimes, and protectionist tariffs.

    As Congress and the administration prepare to tackle these issues – in Washington and abroad – they are reminded of the importance of protecting America’s green innovation economy and creating new jobs by enshrining strong green tech intellectual property rights as part of the solution to this global challenge. In doing so, they will give us more reason to celebrate the next time “Green Innovation Week” comes around as we make progress towards a healthier planet and putting people to work through innovation.

    david-hirschmann_smallDavid Hirschmann is president & CEO of Global Intellectual Property Center, and president & CEO of the Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness at the United States Chamber of Commerce.

     

    Comments

    1. Green Patent Blog® » Blog Archive » New Alliance’s Big IDEA: Strong IP is Essential for Green Innovation says:

      [...] very collaborative I mean share all intellectual property as much as possible.”  (see the IP-Watch op-ed by David Hirschmann, President & CEO of the [...]

    2. Photomaniacal » Blog Archive » Green technology should be shared | Mark Weisbrot says:

      [...] According to Inside US Trade, the US chamber of commerce is gearing up for a fight to limit the access of developing countries to environmentally sound technologies (ESTs). They fear that international climate change negotiations, taking place under the auspices of the United Nations, will erode the position of corporations holding patents on existing and future technologies. [...]

    3. Big Business Gearing Up to Defend Protectionism Against UN Climate Negotiators « Chrisy58’s Weblog says:

      [...] According to Inside US Trade, the US chamber of commerce is gearing up for a fight to limit the access of developing countries to environmentally sound technologies (ESTs). They fear that international climate change negotiations, taking place under the auspices of the United Nations, will erode the position of corporations holding patents on existing and future technologies. [...]

    4. UN Climate Talks: Cleantech IP Battle of the Year? says:

      [...] with the Chamber of Commerce, has taken isssue with the idea of opening up advanced clean technologies, as has GE’s Ecomagnination chief, [...]

    5. Vil du gerne forurene mindre? Betal for patenter ved kasse 1 | Modpress says:

      [...] Mark Weisbrot skriver i The Guardian: According to Inside US Trade, the US chamber of commerce is gearing up for a fight to limit the access of developing countries to environmentally sound technologies (ESTs). They fear that international climate change negotiations, taking place under the auspices of the United Nations, will erode the position of corporations holding patents on existing and future technologies. [...]

    6. US Capitalists Organize Energy Tech Patents for Extortion of World’s Most Vulnerable « It’s Getting Hot In Here says:

      [...] climate change negotiations, taking place under the auspices of the United Nations, will erode the position of corporations holding patents on existing and future technologies.  Developing countries such as Brazil, India, and China have indicated that if — as expected [...]

    7. Patent Baristas » Should Green Technology Be Subject To Compulsory Licensing? says:

      [...] According to Inside US Trade, the US chamber of commerce is gearing up for a fight to limit the access of developing countries to environmentally sound technologies (ESTs). They fear that international climate change negotiations taking place under the United Nations, will erode the position of corporations holding patents on existing and future technologies. [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 23.22.102.9