SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WIPO Members Move Ahead On Development Agenda Implementation

    Published on 4 May 2009 @ 12:25 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    Members of the World Intellectual Property Organization in difficult negotiations last week approved a new plan for implementation of recommendations for deepening WIPO’s development focus, according to participants.

    The WIPO Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) met from 27 April to 1 May.

    Members loosely decided to proceed in a flexible thematic way on the 45 Development Agenda recommendations approved at the 2007 WIPO General Assemblies. They discussed three themes, opening the way for the WIPO secretariat to seek funding for the recommendations under those themes in its next budget proposal.

    In addition, the governments began debating how to coordinate and report on implementation, which can be a political issue. Developed countries insisted there be no new mechanisms created at WIPO, according to participants, while different developing country groups had suggestions for ways to proceed with reporting of WIPO committee chairs.

    Committee Chairman Trevor Clarke, the Barbados ambassador, will hold informal, non-binding consultations in the lead-up to the September General Assemblies.

    The thematic proposals will be re-issued reflecting comments made during the week and discussed again at the next CDIP meeting scheduled for November, sources said.

    “The process is definitely on track,” said an official from Brazil, one of the originators of the WIPO Development Agenda in 2004. “We have decided to give a chance to a thematic approach. The chairman provided the necessary assurance to proceed with a balanced approach.”

    Key assurances, the Brazilian told Intellectual Property Watch, were that under the thematic approach, individual recommendations would take precedence over themes, projects are evolutionary and can be changed along the way, and the process involves flexibility.

    Chairman Clarke said in an interview afterward that the main agreement was to structure implementation of the adopted recommendations through the thematic project approach. He said this was deemed useful because compromises reached in arriving at the 45 recommendations included some duplication in recommendations.

    The thematic approach seeks to bring together projects or parts of projects with similar activities and implement them, Clarke said. The approach “will help accelerate implementation and do it more efficiently,” he said. The draft chair summary is available here.

    The three themes addressed during the week were recommendations related to: competition; the public domain; and information and communications technology (ICTs) and the digital divide. Details of the projects that will be carried out to implement each are available in the meeting documents available here.

    There was a discussion near the end of the meeting over how to handle access to knowledge concepts in the recommendations. Gurry suggested to add access to knowledge to the title related to ICTs, but some members wanted to ensure the issue remain sufficiently open for future discussion.

    US Cautious on Access, Transparency

    The United States showed resistance on recommendation 19, which urges initiation of discussions of how to facilitate access to knowledge and technology for developing countries. It said proposed changes were a substantial modification and it needed a fuller explanation of them.

    The United States also clarified comments in the report from the July 2008 CDIP related to information about technical assistance being provided by WIPO. The language referred to its request that only general information should be publicly available. Information about specific technical assistance projects should be available only on request from member states and only on consent of the member states and recipients concerned, it said.

    Recommendations addressed during the week included: 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7, plus 19, 24 and 27. These were in addition to recommendation activities approved at the last session of the CDIP in July 2008. (IPW, WIPO, 12 July 2008).

    The secretariat’s detailed proposals on projects under these themes included conducting numerous studies and other initiatives, and estimated budgets and timelines.

    Some changes were made to the secretariat’s proposed projects to ensure they reflect the demands of the recommendations, Clarke said.

    The proposed projects now will go to the WIPO Program and Budget Committee, which meets from 17-19 June.

    The secretariat during the week issued a paper on conditions [pdf] for a thematic projects approach. It clarified that the original recommendations would be kept intact with member modifications, kept open even if a project ends, additional projects may be formulated, sufficient financial resources will be made available, activities may be required for some principles, there is flexibility to review a project, and individual recommendations may be included in more than one project.

    The secretariat also floated draft papers on a conference on “mobilising resources for development,” being planned for 5-9 November in Geneva.

    Draft conference concept paper available here [pdf].

    Revised draft conference programme available here [pdf].

    Coordination and Evaluation

    A key discussion at week’s end was on mechanisms for coordination, evaluation, and reporting on work.

    Pakistan, supported by other Asian countries, proposed that chairs of WIPO committees report to the annual General Assemblies on how their bodies have implemented the Development Agenda recommendations.

    The Pakistan proposal [pdf] called for the assemblies in September “instruct all WIPO committees to mainstream all Development Agenda recommendations in their work.”

    It also requested the WIPO director general to make opening remarks at upcoming meetings of the assemblies and WIPO committees on patents, copyright and related rights, genetic resources, traditional and folklore, programme and budget, trademarks and enforcement. In the remarks, the director general “may emphasise adherence to and implementation of the Development Agenda recommendations,” the proposal said.

    Some African members suggested creating a new entity made up of the chairs of all relevant WIPO committees, according to a source.

    WIPO Director General Francis Gurry addressed the CDIP, restating his commitment to the Development Agenda. He said secretariat coordination will be under the Development Agenda Coordination Division, which reports directly to him. The Acting Director of the Development Agenda Coordination Division is Irfan Baloch of Pakistan.

    During the week, nongovernmental organisations were present and ready to make statements on the issues under discussion. Some circulated their statements at the meeting, expecting them to be submitted for the record of the meeting. Among those included the statement of the Free Software Foundation Europe, and the statement of several international libraries groups [pdf].

    The next CDIP meeting is scheduled for 16-20 November.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.