http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/ Original news and analysis on international IP policy Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:19:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/comment-page-1/#comment-3214216 IP Osgoode » IP Osgoode Speaks: Chris Castle on Voluntary Collective Licensing Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:04:03 +0000 http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2359#comment-3214216 [...] – there are no representations or warranties on rights. Bennett Lincoff on IPWatch provides a long discussion on the implications of rights holders only giving a covenant not to sue instead of providing a [...] [...] – there are no representations or warranties on rights. Bennett Lincoff on IPWatch provides a long discussion on the implications of rights holders only giving a covenant not to sue instead of providing a [...]

]]> http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/comment-page-1/#comment-3150996 Choruss: The Worst Idea Ever Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:49:36 +0000 http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2359#comment-3150996 [...] Choruss’s Covenant: The Promised Land (Maybe) For Record Labels; A Lesser Destination For Everyone... [ip-watch] [...] [...] Choruss’s Covenant: The Promised Land (Maybe) For Record Labels; A Lesser Destination For Everyone… [ip-watch] [...]

]]> http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/comment-page-1/#comment-3150469 IP Osgoode » Voluntary collective licensing, Humpty Dumpty and the house of cards Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:24:31 +0000 http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2359#comment-3150469 [...] is neither voluntary, collective nor a license, you will be interested in reading “Choruss’s Covenant: The Promised Land (Maybe) For Record Labels; A Lesser Destination For Ever...,” a very well-reasoned article by Bennett Lincoff.  Bennett is a distinguished member of the [...] [...] is neither voluntary, collective nor a license, you will be interested in reading “Choruss’s Covenant: The Promised Land (Maybe) For Record Labels; A Lesser Destination For Ever…,” a very well-reasoned article by Bennett Lincoff.  Bennett is a distinguished member of the [...]

]]> http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/comment-page-1/#comment-3149260 Music Ally | Blog Archive » Will Choruss screw publishers, songwriters and artists? Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:03:44 +0000 http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2359#comment-3149260 [...] legal file-sharing on university campuses. A long article on the blog Intellectual Property Watch fillets the scheme’s business model, focusing on the question of whether it will use a licensing model, or a covenant not to [...] [...] legal file-sharing on university campuses. A long article on the blog Intellectual Property Watch fillets the scheme’s business model, focusing on the question of whether it will use a licensing model, or a covenant not to [...]

]]> http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/comment-page-1/#comment-3148750 Games » Blog Archive » Choruss’ Music Tax Plan: Bait-And-Switch Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:33:36 +0000 http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2359#comment-3148750 [...] plan — but as IP attorney Bennett Lincoff points out, what Griffin and Choruss are proposing is to pull the wool over universities and the public’s eyes. The plan, as we originally pointed out, isn’t a license: it’s merely a covenant not to [...] [...] plan — but as IP attorney Bennett Lincoff points out, what Griffin and Choruss are proposing is to pull the wool over universities and the public’s eyes. The plan, as we originally pointed out, isn’t a license: it’s merely a covenant not to [...]

]]> http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/comment-page-1/#comment-3148620 Choruss’ Music Tax Plan: Bait-And-Switch | bitbucket.kylewelsh.com Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:18:59 +0000 http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2359#comment-3148620 [...] the plan -- but as IP attorney Bennett Lincoff points out, what Griffin and Choruss are proposing is to pull the wool over universities and the public's eyes. The plan, as we originally pointed out, isn't a license: it's merely a covenant not to sue -- and [...] [...] the plan — but as IP attorney Bennett Lincoff points out, what Griffin and Choruss are proposing is to pull the wool over universities and the public’s eyes. The plan, as we originally pointed out, isn’t a license: it’s merely a covenant not to sue — and [...]

]]> http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/17/chorusss-covenant-the-promised-land-maybe-for-record-labels-a-lesser-destination-for-everyone-else/comment-page-1/#comment-3148617 Web News Site » Blog Archive » Choruss’ Music Tax Plan: Bait-And-Switch Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:18:14 +0000 http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2359#comment-3148617 [...] the plan -- but as IP attorney Bennett Lincoff points out, what Griffin and Choruss are proposing is to pull the wool over universities and the public's eyes. The plan, as we originally pointed out, isn't a license: it's merely a covenant not to sue -- and [...] [...] the plan — but as IP attorney Bennett Lincoff points out, what Griffin and Choruss are proposing is to pull the wool over universities and the public’s eyes. The plan, as we originally pointed out, isn’t a license: it’s merely a covenant not to sue — and [...]

]]>