<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concerns Continue Over Generic Drug Seizures As Legality Debates Begin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/05/concerns-continue-over-generics-drug-seizures-as-legality-debates-begin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/05/concerns-continue-over-generics-drug-seizures-as-legality-debates-begin/</link>
	<description>Original news and analysis on international IP policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WTO Session Tackles Details Of Future Register Of GI Products</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/05/concerns-continue-over-generics-drug-seizures-as-legality-debates-begin/comment-page-1/#comment-3144685</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WTO Session Tackles Details Of Future Register Of GI Products</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2184#comment-3144685</guid>
		<description>[...] Previous special sessions had included long talks over this linkage, but this was less a focus at this meeting, though several member states did speak up to say that they still considered the register issue to be a part of a group of three. The other issues were the subject of discussion at the 3 March TRIPS Council meeting as well (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 5 March 2009). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previous special sessions had included long talks over this linkage, but this was less a focus at this meeting, though several member states did speak up to say that they still considered the register issue to be a part of a group of three. The other issues were the subject of discussion at the 3 March TRIPS Council meeting as well (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 5 March 2009). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alarm Escalates Over Delayed Generic Drug Shipments As Action Sought</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/03/05/concerns-continue-over-generics-drug-seizures-as-legality-debates-begin/comment-page-1/#comment-3144643</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alarm Escalates Over Delayed Generic Drug Shipments As Action Sought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=2184#comment-3144643</guid>
		<description>[...] The issue was front and centre at the 3 March meeting of the WTO Council on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 5 March 2009). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The issue was front and centre at the 3 March meeting of the WTO Council on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 5 March 2009). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.ip-watch.org @ 2012-02-10 03:31:50 -->
