SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Potential Names For Obama IP Team Swirl; WTO IP Chief “Imminent”

    Published on 27 January 2009 @ 9:33 am

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By Liza Porteus Viana for Intellectual Property Watch and William New
    Changes in several key international agencies and governments will bring a cadre of new faces to positions that address intellectual property policy, and some potential names for those spots have been circulating in recent weeks.

    The naming of the new chief of the World Trade Organization IP Division is “imminent,” according to sources close to the process. But the WTO is remaining tight-lipped until the details have been worked out, which might take a few weeks. The acting head of the IP Division, Hannu Wager, is not seeking the permanent post, according to sources.

    The World Intellectual Property Organization is still in the process of deciding upon a new chief economist and a new head of “global issues,” such as climate change or food security, an informed source said. [Editor's note: also at WIPO, the director general will shortly invite governments to nominate candidates for deputy director general positions, to be finalised during 2009.]

    As US President Barack Obama began his first weeks in office in late January, many IP-related positions also remain unfilled. But with economic stimulus, the closing of Guantanamo Bay and pending confirmations taking centre stage right now, it is unlikely some of these posts will be filled quickly.

    US Commerce Department

    The highest position – and most likely to be filled first – is that of Commerce Department secretary (which oversees the US Patent and Trademark Office, among other things). Former Energy secretary and current New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson was tapped for the post, but later dropped out amid an investigation into some of his state dealings. There are several names floating around, but John Thompson appears to be the top candidate. Thompson is chairman and CEO of California-based software security company Symantec, which is a leading member of the Coalition for Patent Fairness. Numerous sources have told Intellectual Property Watch that Thompson may be the leading contender, and his name is being welcomed by many, including Silicon Valley (California) lawmakers, Representatives Zoe Lofgren and Anna Eshoo.

    Thompson had talks with the Obama transition team, but so far, no formal word as to whether he has been officially asked. At one inauguration party on 20 January, Thompson told National Journal’s Daily Dose that, if chosen, he would be honoured to serve.

    “Clearly, we need to get the financial engine running – but we also have to make sure that in that process we create as many jobs as possible – that we put Americans back to work,” he said. “No industry in this country has done a better job of putting people to work – of creating more jobs – than the tech sector has.”

    Another name floated is William Daley, a Chicagoan (like Obama) and who served as Commerce secretary under President Clinton. He has said, though, that the department needs a bit of an overhaul to stay relevant.

    USPTO Director

    John Doll is the acting head of the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) until Obama names a replacement for Jon Dudas who left this month. Q. Todd Dickinson, who had the job under Clinton and is the current executive director of the American Intellectual Property Law Association, is among the contenders, as is David Kappos, IBM’s assistant general counsel for patent law, who helped design the patent-sharing “Eco-Patent Commons” with Sony, Pitney Bowes and Nokia. Shanna Winters, chief counsel to Rep. Howard Berman, a California Democrat and former head of the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property, was also thought to be in the running.

    At USPTO, Raymond T. Chen was tapped in December as agency solicitor general. As a non-political appointee, Chen is expected to stay on for Obama’s administration. The solicitor general’s primary responsibility is to defend decisions of the USPTO director, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and examiners in patent and trademark cases.

    IP “Tsar”

    The IP “tsar,” or IP enforcement coordinator, is a new position created by the Pro-IP Act, signed into law by former President Bush late last year, and will focus on enforcement. The executive-level nominee must be confirmed by the Senate and will be housed in the Office of the President. Industry sources say Shira Perlmutter and Victoria Espinel are among the top candidates.

    Perlmutter, an Obama campaign donor, is a music industry lobbyist and intellectual property lawyer at the International Federation for the Phonographic Industry. She has also worked for Time Warner, was a key negotiator for the US government in the 1996 WIPO Internet treaties, and was a consultant to WIPO on copyright and electronic commerce.

    Espinel, a law professor at George Mason University in Virginia and former chief policy advisor to the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on intellectual property and trade issues. Espinel would not comment to Intellectual Property Watch on the IP tsar job but she’s believed to be a top contender.

    Other names floated: Hal Ponder, director of government relations for the American Federation of Musicians; RIAA lobbyist/ex-Clinton aide Michele Ballantyne; NBC Universal government relations chief Alec French; and Jennifer Duck, chief counsel to California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

    Some industry players may run into some problems with Obama’s new lobbying rules, which say anyone working in his administration cannot have lobbied the agency in which they work for two years prior to their appointment.

    The Computer & Communications Industry Association is calling on the administration to appoint people to Commerce and USPTO who can bring reform and encourage innovation, and thinks the next USPTO chief should be more than a patent lawyer. As for the IP tsar position, CCIA wants someone who is “a visionary, as well as a manager and a diplomat,” said CCIA President Ed Black. “PTO can be important to making innovation work, but it needs to be connected to broader thinking about innovation and concerned with results, not just churning out patents.”

    US Trade Representative

    Former Dallas, Texas Mayor Ron Kirk has been chosen as the next USTR. Well-known in the tech sector for this work on the Clinton administration’s internet tax coalition that studied the possible effects of local and international taxation and tariffs on the internet, Kirk is “an enormously able person who has great political experience,” said Emery Simon, counsellor at the Business Software Alliance The US Chamber of Commerce said Kirk’s appointment and his “appreciation for IP is a welcome sign for innovators and workers in our creative sectors.” Rights holder groups also praised his appointment.

    Kirk will be dealing with the advancement of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and other trade deals, enforcement, and making sure those countries seen as not living up to their international IP obligations are on the USTR annual Special 301 list of countries to watch.

    FCC Chief

    Obama is expected to name venture capitalist and former Federal Communications Commission Legal Counsel Julius Genachowski to head the FCC. The FCC chief will have to deal with the push for internet neutrality, which calls for equal access to the internet for all Americans, among other issues. Current Chairman Kevin Martin’s FCC has argued there is no need for federal legislation mandating Net neutrality, since the agency already has principles. Genachowski, who served as Obama’s tech adviser during the campaign, agrees with the president better broadband rollout is essential for internet access.

    The news of Genachowski’s impending nomination brought resoundingly positive response from the technology community and other corners. Genachowski, who crafted Obama’s technology and innovation plan, “understands the importance of open networks and a regulatory environment that promotes innovation and competition to a robust democracy and a health economy,” said Public Knowledge President Gigi Sohn.

    CCIA’s Ed Black said “the challenges and opportunities confronting the next chairman are neither partisan nor ideological, but it will take the policy, political and business acumen he has acquired in his many roles to strike the right balance between regulation and free-market deference.”

    Other Movers and Shakers

    Over at the Justice Department, Neil MacBride, former vice president for anti-piracy and general counsel of the Business Software Alliance has been appointed associate deputy attorney general. He will oversee policy and legislative offices and advise the attorney general on criminal justice and intellectual property issues. He formerly worked on IP issues as counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee and chief counsel to former Democratic Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware.

    Recording Industry Association of America lawyer Thomas Perrelli has been nominated to be associate attorney general. Perrelli has represented the industry in copyright suits and digital piracy litigation, including those arising from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

    Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, is still chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and has authored many pieces of IP-related legislation. Aaron Cooper, Leahy’s chief counsel, is working on IP issues for the chairman. The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Internet, and Intellectual Property will no longer deal with many IP issues; instead, they will be taken up by the full Judiciary committee, headed by Rep. John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat.

    Rep. Rich Boucher, D-Virginia, is the new head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet. Boucher, co-chair of the Congressional Internet Caucus, has also served two decades on the Judiciary subcommittee with jurisdiction over the Internet and intellectual property. He’s known as a strong advocate of consumer rights. The full Energy and Commerce Committee is headed by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-California. The Senate Committee on Committee, Science and Transportation is headed by Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii.

    On the international front, several names surfaced as possible candidates for a senior policy position at the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations in Geneva, but all were unconfirmed. One possible name was Albert Tramposch, a European Union consultant currently representing the Czech Republic. Another possible contender was Francisco Mingorance of the BSA in Brussels.

    For the WIPO global issues tsar, two possible names were Julian Fleet of UNAIDS or Tom Bombelles, formerly of Merck, a source said.

    Meanwhile, with patent reform being one of the top IP issues to watch in the United States this year, a new coalition has formed to push its agenda. The Manufacturers Alliance on Patent Policy, consisting of companies like Corning, DuPont, Milliken and Monsanto, wants to make sure the manufacturing sector is not adversely affected in any dramatic chances to patent policy.

    Liza Porteus Viana may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Intellectual Property Watch » Blog Archive » Obama Administration Lock(e)s And Loads Against Movie Piracy says:

      [...] the White House needs to determine how the position will fit within the policy structure there (IPW, US Policy, 27 January 2009). A USPTO director should be named much sooner, possibly even this [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.