SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WIPO Pitches Proposed Programme Of Strategic Realignment

    Published on 29 October 2008 @ 5:24 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By William New
    A few weeks after its new director general took office, the World Intellectual Property Organization has announced a programme of strategic realignment in the secretariat aimed at opening up the organisation and improving the focus on customer service. The plan includes creating 22 new posts, making permanent some 30 other contract employees, and a pricey feasibility study on construction of a new multimillion dollar conference centre, according to government sources.

    On Thursday, an informal meeting with interested member states will be held at WIPO to further discuss the proposal, where governments may give their reactions, sources said. The secretariat, including Director General Francis Gurry, presented the programme to the WIPO Audit Committee in early October and again to all members on 20 October. Some presentations are available on the WIPO website here.

    Gurry also explained his strategy and his style in an interview with Intellectual Property Watch, available for subscribers here.

    The secretariat is consulting with members, including regional groups, in the lead-up to the Program and Budget Committee meeting on 10-11 December, followed by an extraordinary General Assembly on 12 December.

    According to government sources, WIPO officials are proposing 22 new posts, ranging from a new chief economist and director of global challenges such as climate change, to employees in information technology and translation. WIPO has been under a hiring freeze in recent years.

    Some changes have also happened quickly in WIPO organisational structure. The Office of the Director General is now headed by Marc Sery-Koré, replacing the previous Chef de Cabinet Michèle Weil-Guthmann, who has become senior director-advisor to Philippe Petit, Deputy Director General for General Affairs and Administration; and the Office of the Controller, which used to report directly to the director general, has been moved under the General Affairs and Administration Sector. Philippe Favatier is now the chief financial officer and controller, at the head of the newly streamlined Department of Finance, Budget and Program Management, replacing former Controller Carlotta Graffigna who moved to the Copyright and Related Rights Sector.

    Another notable change to the organisational structure is the addition of a Development Agenda Coordination Division, reporting directly to the director general. This division is headed by Pushpendra Rai.

    Early reactions from several members to the proposed realignment appeared positive, though many said they would seek more details, especially about the possibly $3 million feasibility study for the new conference centre (which itself presumably would fall under a future budget). According to sources, the centre would be separate from the new building being constructed at WIPO right now, and could possibly be rented out when not in use by WIPO. It is unclear how often WIPO would need such a large meeting space beyond its annual General Assemblies, but overcrowding in its current main conference hall occasionally is a concern at regular committee meetings during the year.

    Streams of Realignment

    There are three “streams” to the realignment, according to information on the WIPO website. The first is to change the corporate culture to instil shared values and move to an organisation-wide “customer-service orientation,” with consideration of every type of stakeholder. This will include introducing a culture of “value for money,” “performance” and “quality,” according to a secretariat presentation on the programme.

    The second stream is re-engineering business processes to ensure that WIPO’s core administrative and management processes are “responsive, service-oriented and cost-effective.” This involves reviewing WIPO’s core administrative business processes and identifying ways to simplify and improve them. It also involves ensuring use of the latest information technology solutions, procurement and other processes.

    The third stream is to realign programmes, organisational structure and resources in line with strategic goals, including to assess divisions’ objectives and mandates, identify any gap in human and financial resources as well as ways to address the gap, and implement a new performance appraisal system. An independent professional assessment of WIPO human resources in recent years showed appraisals to need improvement.

    The timeline given by WIPO for the overall realignment is 2 to 3 years, starting with a new communications strategy and restructuring this month. This would be followed by review of patents and the Patent Cooperation Treaty, plus arbitration and mediation in November and December; development-related organisational units in January and February 2009; and trademark and industrial designs in March and April 2009. “A more comprehensive plan ensuring linkages across different streams and initiatives will be prepared,” the secretariat presentation said.

    On WIPO’s new communications strategy would have internal and external aspects, according to a 20 October presentation. The external objectives would aim to increase confidence in WIPO through “trusted, two-way communication,” and position the organisation as “the leading provider of IP services and information.” The Communications Division will integrate different activities related to information and customer services.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

    Categories: News, English, United Nations, WIPO

     

    Comments

    1. Droits d’auteur et bibliothèques « pintiniblog says:

      [...] [màj 31/10/08: lire aussi] [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 50.16.17.90