SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • Congratulations upon re-election;-WHO chief.Priori... »
  • Great article. Ms. Chan may want to read our book ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Brazil Probes Pharmaceutical Industry For Building High-Cost Drug Demand

    Published on 8 August 2008 @ 4:54 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By Claudia Jurberg for Intellectual Property Watch
    RIO DE JANEIRO – An investigation was conducted recently by the civil police in Sao Paulo State, Brazil, against multinational pharmaceutical companies, in which the prosecution affirmed that laboratories pay lawyers to get patients the right to obtain high-cost medicines through the Brazilian health ministry.

    According to O Estado de São Paulo, one of the nation’s largest newspapers, the action is against the laboratories Abbott, Novartis, Serono (Merck), Wyeth, and the firm Benatti. The investigation began after two citizens, who identified themselves as former employees of Wyeth, last year sent a letter to the Ministry of Health. The case is being kept secret, with no public information available, sources said.

    For the Sao Paulo government the bill from such practices is high. According to information from the State Health Secretary in an interview with Intellectual Property Watch, there are 300,000 patients in the system who receive the high-priced drugs. To distribute these drugs, the state of Sao Paulo needs to disburse US$530 million. Brazil has 26 states and one federal district.

    The Brazilian Constitution, promulgated in 1988, affirms in Article 8 that “health is a right for all” and the National Health System (in Portuguese, Sistema Único de Saúde or SUS) provides that access to health is essential, including access to medicines. Under a health reform, Brazil established a health system based on decentralised universal access, with municipalities providing comprehensive and free health care to each individual in need financed by the states and federal government. This system includes access to drugs.

    Lawyer Luiz Antonio Yunes, a specialist in this kind of action against the government, told Intellectual Property Watch that it is very common for patients to earn this right and afterwards receive the drug in a few days.

    “When I promote an action to a patient to receive a drug with high cost and this drug is not covered by the health system, the process moves very quickly and in a week or 10 days, the maximum period, the patient will receive medicine necessary for the treatment. Up to now, I have never lost an action of this kind, because this right has been guaranteed by the Brazilian Constitution,” he said.

    The majority of his actions were for patients with neurological diseases or cancer. He also has patients with diabetic disease, a group of patients that needs specific equipment to measure blood glucose in addition to the drugs. Yunes does not charge his customers because he had a similar experience when he applied and received from the government, for five years, an imported drug from Israel to treat his multiple sclerosis.

    The SUS has been in existence for years, and is a network with a variety of services assisting 190 million people, 80 percent of whom depend exclusively on the system.

    One of the guidelines of the SUS is the National Policy on Medicines. Implemented in 1998, this policy established free access to a number of essential drugs, which appear on the National Drug List (the acronym in Portuguese is Rename). The list comprises 330 drugs, eight correlates and 34 immunological therapies. The Health Ministry said that Rename follows parameters laid out by World Health Organization (WHO). The government analyses the primary diseases in the country. For each disease, the government chooses one or two drugs most appropriate to treat them, following the philosophy of the WHO.

    The National Drug List is continuously reviewed to reflect modifications in data from epidemiological profiles with new diseases and other health disorders. Another factor that contributes to modifications is advances in the pharmaceutical industry with the launching of new drugs.

    The current Rename was published in 2006 and, since that time, the list has been reviewed to update it and a new one will be published in October 2008. According to data from the Brazilian Health Ministry, the market for medicine in the country is around US$14 billion and in 2007 it was ninth compared with other countries in the world.

    In terms of revenue, the official laboratories represent 5 percent of the market, the private laboratories with national capital 35 percent, and foreign capital laboratories have 60 percent. In 2007, among the 10 major laboratories in Brazil, four are Brazilian and operate on domestic capital. This situation is closely related to the growth of the market for generic drugs.

    With regards to essential medicines, the Health Ministry invests every year around US$650 million and states and municipalities invest another US$530 million. The Health Ministry clarified that in all Brazilian municipalities there are medicines financed by public resources. The Health Ministry as well as states and municipalities invest resources toward pharmaceutical assistance. All three levels of government pay toward essential drugs for citizens, but some cases vary, such as higher cost drugs (only federal and state), or specific programmes, such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and leprosy (only the federal Health Ministry).

    Press officers of the Abbott and Novartis laboratories did not answer email requests for comment.

    Claudia Jurberg may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Ao pensarmos em propriedade intelectual é difícil imaginar um caso de abuso de poder, o inventor ou autor possuem o direito exclusivo de fruir suas criações, sendo assim fixam os preços que bem entenderem para a concessão de licenças says:

      [...] Claudia Jurberg, Brazil Probes Pharmaceutical Industry For Building High-Cost Drug Demand, IP-Watch em 8 de Agosto de [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.