SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • This is certainly a good move, but perhaps this is... »
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    People: Change Of IP Guard At US, Australia Missions; IFPMA Readies New Leader

    Published on 7 May 2008 @ 3:54 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By Kaitlin Mara and William New
    At the United States Mission in Geneva, David Morfesi is departing after nearly two years of service on trade-related intellectual property issues. Meanwhile, two new employees are joining the mission. Patent lawyer Nancy Omelko will be taking over his trade-related IP duties in early May, as a part of the US mission to the World Trade Organization. And US Patent and Trademark Office patent attorney Debbie Lashley-Johnson, also arriving in early May, will take over non-trade related IP issues at the US mission to the UN and specialised agencies. Lashley-Johnson is currently on assignment to the US State Department, and will join the Economic and Science Affairs office at the US mission to the UN. Lisa Carle will continue as counsellor for economic and science affairs until she departs in late July. Her eventual successor will continue as head of the section, with overall responsibility for IP and other economic and science issues, though Lashley-Johnson likely will take over a number of IP duties as IP attaché.

    Tegan Brink, second secretary at the Australian permanent mission to the WTO, is leaving. After 3 years in Geneva as Australia’s delegate on IP matters in WIPO and the WTO, she will be taking a year’s leave from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to undertake a Masters of Laws (LLM) at Columbia University in New York.

    Former US IP negotiator Jon Santamauro joined law firm Sidley Austin’s Washington, DC office in January. He previously served at the US Patent and Trademark Office and was a top US negotiator in Geneva. Santamauro was seen at the 28 April – 3 May WHO Intergovernmental Working Group on Health on Public Health, Innovation, and Intellectual Property representing the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO).

    Harvey Bale will retire as director general of the Geneva-based International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA) this summer, after serving as the organisation’s head for eleven years. As DG, Bale worked to strengthen regulatory capacity on pharmaceuticals in emerging economies, and to develop public-private partnerships on medicines and vaccines, IFPMA said in a release. Bale stated, “The industry will continue to face challenges, many of them we are familiar with, but new ones will undoubtedly also emerge. However, I am confident that I leave the IFPMA in better shape to face the many challenges ahead.” A search for his successor began in 2007, and a candidate appears to have been chosen but has not been announced. Unconfirmed rumours among industry were that the new leader might be Alicia Greenidge, a senior official at the US mission to the WTO in Geneva. Greenidge did not return requests for comment by presstime.

    After more than two years delay, the empty lot in front of the World Intellectual Property Organization is finally seeing some action, as construction has begun in earnest on WIPO’s new office building. Total cost for new construction is expected to be about 150 million Swiss francs ($144.4 million), with an expected project completion date of October 2010, according to WIPO. Swiss firm Implenia Entreprise Générale was chosen as general contractor, with a syndicate of two banks: Banque Cantonale de Genève and Banque Cantonale Vaudoise, providing part of the project’s financing. The new administrative building will comprise 560 work places, leading to the expected closure of other WIPO offices around Geneva.

    US think tank iGrowthGlobal has a new name and a new website, though it will retain its focus on information and communications technology and energy policy. Now the Technology Policy Institute, and newly located at www.techpolicyinstitute.org, it will undertake research in the economics and policy incentives of innovation. The organisation, headed by Tom Lenard, attempts to advice policymakers on how to incentivise the development of technologies to improve worldwide living standards.

    The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which oversees the domain name system, is looking to appoint an independent evaluator to determine if its board is fulfilling its purpose and if any change in structure or operations will improve its effectiveness. The review is likely to include “personal interviews, surveys, research and consultation with [ICANN] members” said the press release, as well as any other forms of research deemed important by the selected reviewer. The review is expected to commence in the second quarter of 2008. Meanwhile, ICANN’s Nominating Committee for 2008, which has been working since November 2007 to find qualified candidates for ICANN’s Board of Directors, At-Large Advisory Committee, and the Country Code Names and Generic Names Supporting Organization Councils, closed its nomination period on 15 April. Thirteen female and 65 male candidates submitted their names for consideration; their applications will be evaluated in the coming months, with the final selections to be announced in September 2008.

    The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) announced several promotions in its legal and anti-piracy departments. Kori Bernards, who has been working with MPAA’s public relations department for three years, will take over as senior vice president of communications, where she will work on education and copyright awareness and protection. Dan Robbins will become senior vice president and associate general council, where his legal focus will include intellectual property law, as well as technology and antitrust law. He will continue to serve as general council at MovieLabs, a movie industry collaboration dedicated to researching distribution methods and anti-piracy efforts as influenced by new technology. Mike Robinson, who joined MPAA’s anti-piracy department two years ago as vice president of US anti-piracy will now also take over anti-piracy management in Canada as senior vice president of North American anti-piracy operations. Ted Shapiro is a new senior vice president at the European, Middle East and Africa office, where he will manage copyright, internet, and digital technology issues.

    Have a people item to share? Email kmara@ip-watch.ch!

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.