SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    EU Online Copyright Bill Coming; Publishers Debate DRMs

    Published on 9 December 2007 @ 7:41 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By William New
    BRUSSELS – European publishers and copyright holders have a friend in European Information Society Commissioner Viviane Reding, which she reinforced last week in describing efforts to push through a new bill on digital publishing copyrights. At the same event, publishers and cutting-edge US technology company SecondLife debated IP issues such as the problems of digital rights management for protecting copyrights.

    “Copyright is a cornerstone of the information and knowledge-based society,” Reding told the 6 December European Publishers’ Forum. “This is why I introduced in the new framework an appropriate balance between ownership and access.”

    “This is a concrete legal endorsement of the role of copyright and I hope it will send a signal across the whole industry at a critical time,” she said.

    The electronic communications package, which she has spent weeks promoting, aims to create a new regulatory framework will encourage competition among online services provided by print media, book publishers and the database industry, she said.

    “With the telecom package, I want to support competitiveness, innovation and creativity,” Reding said. “It is the first time that an electronic communications package includes specific requirements for network operators and users to respect copyright law.”

    Reding added: “People don’t buy technology, they acquire contents and services. Therefore, the new rules contain references concerning compliance with national measures implementing the Copyright Directive and the Enforcement Directive. Moreover, the Universal Service Directive says that member states shall ensure that subscribers to electronic communications services or networks are clearly informed in advance of their obligations to respect copyright and related rights and of the most common acts of infringements and their legal consequences.”

    In her speech she also said the European Commission would in the coming weeks adopt a communication on media literacy in the digital environment that will focus on how Internet search engines work and help users to critically assess online content. This appears to include an emphasis on respect for copyrights. She said she would ask member states to support the communication by organising events in 2008 on the exchange of good practices. The Commission could follow with a recommendation on the issue, which she said will be a priority for the Slovenian presidency of the EU coming beginning 1 January.

    Reding also gave support to an open standard project called the Automated Content Access Protocol (ACAP), developed by publishers to allow them to control what is identified by Internet search engine robot “crawlers.”

    In addition, Reding chastised publishers for so far failing to fully adapt their business models to reach across borders and industry sectors at a time when the Internet has changed the business dynamic. “It seems the convergent European publisher has not been born yet,” she said.

    She said the Commission plans to play a catalyst role in this through a “communication on creative content online in the single market,” which will generate business negotiations and improve legal certainty.

    Reding also said publishers face a big challenge in determining how to generate revenues in the digital age, and that most news and magazine publishers still earn less than 5 percent of revenues from new media, though this should double in the next year.

    Finally, Reding stressed the importance of protecting the rights of journalists.

    SecondLife Exec Bashes DRMs

    Cory Ondrejka, chief technology officer at online society SecondLife, told publishers that opportunities exist for copyrighted products there but that digital rights management (DRM) could be a hindrance.

    On SecondLife, users retain the intellectual property rights over things they create, and all users have the tools to create such as in games, art and music, he said. But Ondrejka tied innovation to the cost of learning, and this cost is driven up as access to knowledge goes down, which is a by-product of technological restrictions on information flows in order to protect copyrights.

    “As people get used to working across different environments, there’s one thing that’s going to slow us down,” he said, referring to DRM. “DRM by its design increases the cost of learning. It impedes people’s ability to learn.”

    Ondrejka said that online environments are encouraging innovation and help maximise connections between cultures, and that publishers and creators have increasing opportunities to influence that.

    The largest representation of SecondLife users is from Europe, about 40 percent, followed by the United States at about 33 percent, he said. Takeup of SecondLife is highest where high-speed Internet access predominates, he said.

    Publishers Highlight IP Issues

    In panel discussions during the meeting, a number of publishers addressed IP issues. Ronald Schild, CEO of German book marketer and publisher MVB, said the biggest challenge for industry is to reconcile the needs of the copyright holder with the public right to get information, and “not make the same mistake as the music industry” by using DRM. Publishers are working with models, such as allowing free access to portions of text, but said there is a need to be “user-friendly.”

    Stephanie van Duin, director of business development at Hachette Books, also said the publishing industry needs to learn from “what happened to the music industry.” She stressed the importance of allowing consumers to move across technological platforms.

    Publishers who were asked did not seem to view online bookseller Amazon.com’s new wireless book reading technology Kindle as potentially disruptive. “I do not think Kindle will be the book killer,” Schild said.

    Panellists also covered the rise of “multiplatforms” by which content is used across different media, transforming traditional media outlets. Mario Tascon, director general for content at Spain’s PrisaCom, which publishes stalwart El Pais, said Internet and newspaper are two totally different media. He made a comparison with the introduction of radio, when it was first thought that newspapers should be read over the radio as a way to take advantage of the new technology.

    Publishers generally insisted that print would survive for the foreseeable future. David Hanger, president of the European Federation of Magazine Publishers and former publisher of The Economist, said readers have an irreplaceable love for magazines.

    Tomasz Jozefacki, director of the Internet division at Polish publisher Agora, described the company’s expansion into new growth areas on the Internet such as blogs (the company’s blog has about 100,000 new entries every day), and a social network. Several publishers said distinctions are made between what is news and what is said in online chats, but that both are important and interesting to readers.

    Claude Droussent, editorial director at l’Equipe, said the company also has expanded to “all kinds of media.” He gave an example of responsiveness to readers that during next year’s Beijing Olympics it will be impossible to tell readers to wait until the next day’s morning daily print version to obtain information about developments that have ended many hours earlier. He said his company’s motto is “one media, one content,” so that journalists must learn to use and produce for all types of output.

    Andrew Moger, founder of the News Media Coalition, said there has been an “upheaval” over access of journalists to events, which led to the group’s formation.

    Reding predicted that even in the technological changes and flood of information that is occurring, there will remain some distinction between types of journalists and that readers will always look back to professional journalists for reliable information in the end.

    But it was repeatedly said at the meeting that advertising is evermore critical for the survival of publishers as online subscriptions and other methods of raising revenues have mixed results.

    “The Internet is becoming more and more free, so advertising is becoming almost the sole source of revenue,” said Pedro Norton, CEO and publisher of Impresa Jornais.

    Kees Spaan, vice president of the European Newspaper Publishers’ Associations and president of the Dutch newspaper association, said that without advertising there would be no newspaper. He harshly criticised Internet search engines like Google and Yahoo for giving away newspapers’ content without partnering with the publishers to ensure they are properly paid.

    But Jean-Christophe Conti, European vice-president for search marketing at Yahoo, encouraged publishers to put their content free online and to make partnerships with search engines so all can benefit from big advertisers. Spaan said his company was not approached for a partnership before its content was used.

    Spaan also said companies even have to wrestle with institutions, like those of government, that purchase one subscription and then send copies around to all of their staff, without having arranged it through a licensing agreement.

    “I’m afraid even serious journalism is at risk,” he said. Spaan’s suggestion was to have “very strong copyright protection.”

    But Fred Friend, a representative of United Kingdom university libraries, noted that copyright “largely protects the rights of publishers not creators,” and that academics regularly “sign away all their rights” in order to get published. He called for a greater balance of payment.

    Reding replied that the Commission is looking at digital libraries, and having talked with different actors is “moving to make changes in that very specific area.” But she added, “I do not promise big solutions.”

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.