SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • This is certainly a good move, but perhaps this is... »
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WIPO Director’s Planned Early Departure Draws Mixed Reactions

    Published on 20 November 2007 @ 7:58 am

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By William New
    When Kamil Idris, the director general of the United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization, informed staff last week that the process for electing his successor would occur one year early, it was met with mixed reactions. It also is likely to be met with a torrent of politicking for the next DG.

    Some have responded to the internal decision with declarations hailing Idris’ honour and contribution to the organisation since he was elected in 1997. Others, including the chair of the WIPO member state executive body and a group of WIPO staff, have sought assurances on his departure date and called into question other members of the staff who have been especially close to Idris.

    Idris came under fire in the past year after changing his birth date in official WIPO records after more than two decades. The correction, along with a variety of other mostly unproven rumours and allegations, led some to generate doubts about his ability to govern the organisation. Idris has not met directly with the media for years.

    Sources have been careful to downplay whether there was a deal struck between Idris and the governments that have pushed for his departure, such as the United States, Switzerland and some in the European Union. It is unclear what pension and severance arrangement Idris will receive.

    On 13 November, Idris’s office issued an email to all WIPO staff (see below) informing them that the process of choosing his successor would begin soon. The Coordination Committee (the roughly 80-member executive body) will select a candidate in May 2008 to propose for election by the full membership at its next annual General Assemblies in September 2008. Member states will soon be invited to submit nominations, the message said.

    The 2007 WIPO General Assemblies failed to pass a budget for the next two years after a fight over the Idris case and over how to spend a surplus from the past two years (IPW, WIPO, 4 October 2007).

    In his note, Idris urged all concerned to approve the budget as soon as possible. Among other things, the new budget funds large-scale new construction expected to begin in February, and new funding was earmarked for development-related activities.

    The Group B developed countries took over the chair of the Coordination Committee at the recent assemblies. Norway issued a letter on behalf of the committee laying out the procedure for selecting a new DG.

    Candidates’ names and curriculum vitae must be submitted by 13 February, and the Coordination Committee will meet to decide on 13-14 May. It will start with a long list and gradually winnow it down to one.

    The Norwegian letter states that: “The government of every member state of WIPO may, if it so desires, propose the name of one of its nationals as candidate for nomination by the WIPO Coordination Committee.” And it seems that as many are considering it.

    It is somewhat unclear when Idris would make his exit, though it appears it would be at the conclusion of the 2008 assemblies.

    US Satisfied, Africa Full of Praise

    The United States, which has led the effort to remove Idris as quickly as possible, stated its satisfaction with the decision. Warren Tichenor, US ambassador to the UN, in a statement called the announcement a “positive development.”

    “The member states and the employees of WIPO deserve to have an organisation that is led with the highest professional ethical standards, and we believe that this renewal of leadership will bring new confidence and vitality to the organisation,” he said. But a US official said later that Idris still faces questions about the allegations that were raised.

    Idris came to Geneva decades ago from Sudan and has had public support from the African Group at WIPO throughout the recent turbulence. The African Union posted a news release to its website, www.african-union.org, dated 26 October following a visit by Idris with ambassador-level officials from the union. Idris thanked them for their support and highlighted 11 points that he said form the core policy and programme direction of WIPO under his leadership. He stressed the importance of his legacy, the release said. The 11 points listed in the release suggest a legacy of focused work on behalf of developing countries.

    The 11 points are topped by the creation of a WIPO Development Agenda (by member states); launch of discussions for a treaty on folklore, traditional knowledge and genetic resources (again by member states); establishment of the WIPO World Wide Academy; support for creative industries in developing countries; establishment of a least-developed country unit, creation of a small-and-medium-sized enterprises unit; advice to developing countries in using flexibilities to the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and on negotiating bilateral and regional free-trade agreements; increased geographic representation in WIPO staff; keeping the executive office independent; generating budget surpluses; and finally, “ensuring that the transition of leadership in the organisation is conducted with dignity and in conformity with extant rules and regulations.” The latter is no small feat in the face of the heavy pressure exerted on him to step down by the organisation’s biggest funders.

    Idris assured the Africans that “there was no crisis in the organisation” despite media reports.

    Idris’ positive impact on the organisation also was captured in comments posted to the Intellectual Property Watch blog.

    Legacy Questioned by Staff

    Meanwhile, a group of WIPO staff referring to itself as Cincinnatus, issued an open letter to Idris, posted to the Intellectual Property Watch Inside Views column, questioning his legacy and comparing his time in office to the totalitarian, spin-filled world imagined by author George Orwell in his book “1984.”

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

    ———

    Message From the DG:

    From: Office.DG Tuesday – November 13, 2007
    To: Wipo.Mail
    Subject: Message from the Director General to all staff / Message du Directeur général au personnel
    Dear colleagues,

    I should like to inform all staff members that I have decided to advance the process for nominating and appointing a Director General, based on the Procedures for the Nomination and Appointment of Directors General of WIPO, adopted by the General Assembly of WIPO in September 1998.

    Following discussions with the Chairs of the General Assembly and of the Coordination Committee, we will shortly be issuing a circular inviting WIPO Member States to nominate for consideration by the Coordination Committee in May 2008, candidates for appointment by the General Assembly at its next session in September 2008.

    With regard to the 2008/2009 Program and Budget recommended for approval by the Program and Budget Committee to the Assemblies of Member States of WIPO in 2007, the Chair of the General Assembly will continue his consultations with group coordinators and will meet in two weeks to consider this important issue. I have personally urged all concerned, in the best interests of the Organization, to proceed soon with the formal approval of the 2008/2009 Program and Budget.

    In the interim, I should like to thank all of you for your continued support and diligence. As I have repeatedly said, the Organization’s strongest asset is its staff members. I look forward to your continued collaboration and do appreciate your many efforts and hard work.

    Thank you.

    Categories: News, English, United Nations, WIPO

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.