SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • Congratulations upon re-election;-WHO chief.Priori... »
  • Great article. Ms. Chan may want to read our book ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    EU Copyright Levies Extend To New Media As Harmonisation Lags

    Published on 11 October 2007 @ 10:15 am

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By Alicia Martin-Santos and Dugie Standeford for Intellectual Property Watch
    European Union countries are imposing copyright levies on a whole new range of digital media, including digital music players, USB flash sticks, hard drives and, potentially, mobile phones and wireless connections, as efforts to harmonise Europe’s heterogeneous copyright landscape continue to languish.

    Copyright levies are imposed on blank material (such as blank CDs, DVDs or paper) or digital recording media (used to store digital content) in order to compensate authors for end-users’ private copying. They first appeared in the 1960s and were charged on paper, photocopying equipment and tapes. New recording media, such as mp3 players (like iPods) or even mobile phones are being examined for potential levying.

    Authors’ societies have found in levies a way to build up revenues in the current context of growing piracy. Industry groups, meanwhile, tend to favour the use of digital rights management (DRM), which tracks only the actual use of the copyrighted material. The 2001 EU Copyright Directive specifies that they should take DRM into account when levies are calculated, but that has not happened, said Mark MacGann, director general of the European Information, Communications and Consumer Electronics Technology Industry Associations.

    Levies are imposed regardless of use of the storage device, even if that use is unrelated to the copyrighted material as in the case of memory cards or USB sticks used to store private photographs or documents. Nevertheless, DRM as an alternative has been considered unfit by some recording companies that have dismissed it after some years’ trial.

    Last December, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso pulled back a proposed recommendation by Internal Market Commissioner Charlie McCreevy reforming levies, saying it needed more thought. He was accused of bowing to pressure from the French government, which argued the levies were an important income source for creators (IPW, Copyright Policy, 16 January 2007).

    Industry groups representing the consumer electronics, telecommunications, information technology and other industry sectors had lobbied for the recommendation, saying the difference in the rates or nature of the levies hinders the free flow of goods in the common market. Ireland, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom, where private copying is not permitted, do not impose levies at all.

    The industry organisations, which formed the Copyright Levies Reform Alliance, sent a strongly worded letter to Barroso last February to which he has not responded, according to an alliance member. Industry is now wondering what’s next, he said. The Commission’s own impact assessment of the reform proposal showed that a problem exists and it will not go away just because it is ignored, MacGann said.

    Countries Extending Levies

    In the meantime, many European countries are extending levies to new devices with the support of authors’ societies and the opposition of industry and consumer groups.

    In France, consumers were to pay extra for USB sticks, external hard drives and memory cards, such as those in digital cameras, from the 1st of October, according to the law. The Albis Commission, in charge of revision of private copy remuneration, may be studying the possibility of extending them to mobile phones.

    The scenario is similar in Spain, where according to reports the government and the Spanish Society of Authors (SGAE) are seeking an agreement to extend levies to mobile phones and digital music players that was expected to be introduced in the next few weeks. The possibility of levies on mobile phones risks infuriating consumers, who generally pay for downloading music or ringtones into their phones, and the mobile phone industry, which is already seen as heavily taxed. The Chamber of Commerce of Madrid said it feared the rise in mobile phone prices will push consumers to buy in other countries, namely Portugal, and it estimated losses of 35 million euros.

    In Germany, the Copyright Law was reformed last July in order to adapt to new technologies (IPW, Copyright Policy, 6 July 2007). With regard to levies, the government has proposed that stakeholders, namely authors’ societies and manufacturers of blank media, negotiate fixed rates which must never exceed five percent. Authors fear percentage taxation will be unfavourable for them as computer prices decrease.

    Proposals by the Italian government to extend levies to other media were strongly opposed by consumers and were not adopted, said Marco Pierani of Altroconsumo. Italians now pay fees of 0.29 euros on CDs and 0.58 euros on 120-minute DVDs, and Altroconsumo is campaigning for the complete elimination of levies “since they cannot coexist with DRM in our point of view,” he said.

    One key market fighting the trend is the United Kingdom. There, an independent Treasury Department study on IP, as well as a parliamentary report, and the government response to it all rejected the idea of imposing levies on copy-capable equipment. Consumers should not be forced to pay more for items they may never use for copying copyrighted materials, the government said.

    Is Levy Reform Possible?

    It is unclear whether the proposed EU reform package is dead or awaiting a more favourable political climate, one industry source said. Many in the Commission believe the issue is so controversial that it will not be resurrected until the next Commission is seated in 2009, the source said. There is a sense that, despite industry complaints, companies can afford levies so there is no political need to expedite a solution, the source added.

    The issue is dead in the Commission’s Internal Market directorate since McCreevy’s recommendation failed, said Cornelia Kutterer, senior legal adviser to the European Consumers’ Organisation. However, she noted, the Commission is reviewing the implementation of the Copyright Directive. Whether an upcoming communication from the Information Society and Media directorate on online content will address issues such as private copying or DRM is uncertain, she said.

    Collecting societies are powerful politically at the national and EU level and would lobby hard against any renewal of levy reform, the industry source said. However, France’s new business-friendly approach and the fact that it will assume the EU presidency next year, could see the main obstacle to change actually brokering an EU solution to the problem, the source added.

    In the meantime, industry is focusing on consumer education, promoting the theory that levies make products more expensive, the industry source said. In some countries, such as France, consumers are becoming very vocal, the source said.

    Dugie Standeford and Alicia Martin-Santos may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Mindaugas Kiskis says:

      Actually Lithuania has just did the opposite – levies on flash memory and HDDs were abolished on 19 September 2007, while new exceptions were introduced for levies paid for traditional CD, DVD and magnetic media.


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.