SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • This is certainly a good move, but perhaps this is... »
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Review: WIPO Employees Accept Need For Organisational Change

    Published on 10 July 2007 @ 3:35 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By William New
    A prevailing attitude among employees at the World Intellectual Property Organization is a “lack of pride” in the United Nations body and an acceptance of needed change to the organisational culture, according to a new report. The commissioned study also found a number of human resources problems, including soaring absence, and said WIPO is already addressing many of the issues.

    The report by PricewaterhouseCoopers was released on 30 June and is posted to the front page of WIPO’s website, www.wipo.int. It was commissioned as a “desk-to-desk assessment” of the human and financial resources of WIPO after the UN Joint Inspection Unit found problems in 2005.

    The report focused on the demand for WIPO’s various services and whether it is appropriately addressing the demand. It found a number of areas where WIPO differs from the norm in Swiss organisations, including low turnover, long tenure, high absence, insubstantial performance or disciplinary practices, and weaknesses in management skills or competencies.

    Diplomats in Geneva have expressed concern that the final report was not altered by WIPO before its release. But the study authors said the final report reflects their work. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers in Geneva told Intellectual Property Watch, “I confirm that the issued final report represents the findings and conclusions of PwC.”

    Sense of Entitlement, Incompetence

    Interviews with staff and managers revealed a sense of entitlement such as abuse of “flextime” or requesting promotions and post reclassification based on length of service rather than merit, PwC said. Also revealed was a sense among workers that managers are not competent, acceptance of the abuse of WIPO systems, unfairness in human resources and “worries about unfair discrimination for ‘speaking out,’” the consulting firm said.

    “We always expect that there will be some venting of feelings during a study of this kind, but this lack of pride has been a consistent theme across the WIPO focus groups, and is supported by comments from managers and supervisors,” PwC said.

    Perhaps the most glaring statistic in the report is that staff sick days average 12.5 days per year, well over double the average of other Swiss organisations polled, which average around 5 days per year. This equals a total loss to WIPO of over 15,000 days, or 75 full-time employees. Ten percent of WIPO staff take more than 27 sick days per year. Average attendance for WIPO staff when all types of leave and holidays are taken into account is 200 days per year.

    The organisation is seen by employees as a stable place to work – apparently for the good pay and benefits – with 2.6 percent turnover in 2006 compared with 7.5 to 10 percent in the Swiss public sector. But PwC also found that no member of the regular staff has been dismissed, at least since 2002, apparently because the performance and disciplinary system is not generally used in a way that leads to disciplinary action. The general organisational interpretation of this system is “deeply flawed,” PwC said, as objectives are unclear, appraisal meetings do not always take place, and performance is usually rated at the highest level.

    Areas of competency that need to be addressed include management, information technology, languages, intellectual property specialisation, and office management, the report said. It noted that WIPO saw rapid growth through the 1990s and up to 2002, hiring many new managers.

    PCT Dominates Jobs

    Despite a wide range of activities at WIPO, nearly 50 percent of staff is employed in two programmes. One is the administration of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, which extends patent applications across member countries. This has the equivalent of more than 450 full-time workers, or 37.5 percent of total WIPO staff.

    The other programme combines management of the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks, the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs, and the Lisbon System for the International Registration of Appellations of Origin. The nearly 139 full-time employees in this programme account for 11.5 percent of total WIPO staff.

    Meanwhile, there are 12 programmes with less than 10 full-time employees attributed to them. Impact of the Development Agenda as yet unknown but new employees are expected.

    There are a number of areas of growth in demand for WIPO’s services. PCT administration is growing at 6 percent per year, Madrid, The Hague and Lisbon registration systems at between 3 and 7 percent annually, and conferences, language, printing and archives at between 15 percent and 30 percent.

    Outsourcing was suggested for printing and publications, building security, information technology, the WIPO Worldwide Academy, and for work overflows and peaks such as with translation.

    The report also found that while employees on short-term contracts, including consultancies, are the minority, some are being asked to carry out tasks that are similar to those under permanent contracts. The average length of service for permanent staff is 10 years while the average short term contracts are five years, which is “exceptionally high,” PwC said. It also found that people being paid at senior levels on permanent contracts sometimes are involved in administrative duties. PwC recommended changes to these practices.

    A number of other statistics were presented in the findings. For instance, the employment structure in the organisation was found to be highly centralised, with 15 direct reports to the director general, which it said could lead to delays in decision-making.

    The total number of employees at WIPO has shrunk slightly over the past five years, PwC said, from 1,353 in 2003 to 1,249 in January 2007. The number of short-term contracts among these also has declined since 2002 to 359 in 2006. But the study suggested more reductions or better use of existing resources.

    Other statistics include: 55 percent of overall staff are female, though at the director level men outnumber women 50 to 9, and at the professional level, 197 to 172.

    Average age in the organisation is 44 years old, with the youngest at 22 and the oldest at 77 (seven are 65 or older). In about four years, retirements are expected to start rising.

    The recommendations called for “early action,” and included a three-year programme of management development. PwC stated that the study is not an investigation and does not address any grievances or allegations.

    “We see significant opportunities for improving performance, removing inefficiencies, and generally either reducing staff numbers or freeing resources for new demands,” PwC said.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.