WIPO Patent Agenda Expected To Be Revived In 2008

Published on 22 June 2007 @ 5:06 pm

By William New, Intellectual Property Watch

After a one-year hiatus, the World Intellectual Property Organization likely will renew its agenda on patent policy issues in 2008 following members’ informal approval Friday of a study on patents to be conducted by the WIPO secretariat in autumn, according to officials.

The WIPO study, or “state of play,” was discussed in consultations with WIPO General Assembly Chairman Enrique Manalo, the Philippines ambassador, and he plans to put it on the agenda for annual assembly meeting in September, he said. The patent agenda, discussed in the WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, is being seen as a departure from contentious past debates over patent harmonisation, Manalo said. In 2007, the SCP was suspended after years of debate over harmonisation.

“We’re trying to embark on a fresh start and get a discussion on patent issues in WIPO,” Manalo told Intellectual Property Watch.

The “state of play” of the patent system, first referred to as a “survey,” will form the basis of discussions in a SCP meeting expected in May or June, officials said. There will be no specific discussion at this point of the Substantive Patent Law Treaty, which would further harmonise national patent laws, Manalo said.

The “indicative draft outline” of the state of play includes nine categories with points beneath. Comments on the draft outline of the “state of play” are due by mid-July. The secretariat will put them together, and Manalo will prepare a new table of contents of the state of play for the assembly, he said.

Manalo said it is “not an exhaustive list,” and would include as many issues as possible that are affecting the international patent system, using facts and statistics and taking into account new developments. An example might be the adoption of the Development Agenda, he said. The paper will not contain a conclusion, Manalo noted.

Indicative draft outline

Introduction: Scope of Survey and Sources of Data
The Current Multilateral Framework
1. Existing International Instruments
  1. Paris, Strasbourg (IPC), PCT, Budapest, PLT, TRIPs
2. Framework Principles
  1. Paris
  2. TRIPs
3. Substantive Norms and Flexibilities
  1. Paris
  2. TRIPs
4. Formalities
  1. PLT (and PCT)
5. Administrative Cooperation
  1. IPC and Budapest
6. International Filing and Processing System
  1. PCT
Demand for Patent Rights and Different Interests and Needs in the International Patent System
Patent Systems and Existing Forms of Cooperation
1. The Application
2. Search and Examination
3. Opposition
4. Issues in Contention: demand management; prior art; subject-matter coverage and exclusions; quality; obviousness; exceptions (including research exemption)
Support Structures for the Patent System
Technology Disclosure through the Patent System
Technology Diffusion and the Patent System
1. Licensing and the Transfer of Technology
2. Standards
The Innovation Incentive in the Context of other Public Policies
1. Health
2. Biological Diversity
3. Traditional Knowledge
4. Ethics
Perceived Threats to the Effectiveness of Patents as Incentives to Innovation
1. Litigation
2. Cost

[End of the document]

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Categories: Subscribers, English, Patent Policy, WIPO

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WIPO Patent Agenda Expected To Be Revived In 2008

Leave a Reply