Officials: European Patent In Five Years, London Protocol By End Of Year

Published on 23 April 2007 @ 3:58 pm

Intellectual Property Watch

By Tove Iren S. Gerhardsen
MUNICH – If high-ranking officials speaking at a recent European Patent Office (EPO) meeting are right, the European fight over languages in patent applications may be over by the end of this year following France’s election, and Europe could have a Community patent within the next five years.

A Community patent would mean that instead of having patents being administered by national offices, including those that have been approved centrally in EPO, one patent would be valid in all of Europe. The talks have been stuck for a long time.

But the European Commission recently pushed again to revive talks on an EU-wide patent in a communication to the European Parliament and Council of member state representatives, proposing to harmonise the litigation system for patents, eventually leading to a central appeal court and a Community patent (IPW, European Policy, 4 April 2007).

The idea got a boost at the 18-19 European Patent Forum/PATINNOVA 07, co-sponsored by the EPO and the European Commission (IPW, European Policy, 19 April 2007). Angela Merkel, German Chancellor and President of the Council of the European Union, and Commission Vice-President Günter Verheugen (Germany) called for strong support.

On language, it would mean that every member state would implement the 2000 London Protocol (Agreement), which proposes to have three official languages for patent applications (German, English and French) instead of all the official EU languages.

Merkel said Europe has to move “very quickly” on the Community patent and the London Protocol, and the Germany EU presidency would push the reform of the patent litigation system forward, but not half-heartedly.

Verheugen said he believed the Community patent could come into effect within the next five years. He said the Commission has not yet had any reaction to the communication.

Verheugen told Intellectual Property Watch that a Community patent would not lead to more patenting but rather better quality patents. He said the effort was mainly to address the cost of patents in Europe. The European patent system is, over the patent term of 20 years, nine times more expensive than the United States and Japanese counterparts, he said.

Verheugen said that protection of IP is not sufficient in Europe and is “terribly fragmented.” He said the Community often works together when it is not vital, but not in areas where it is vital, such as intellectual property, security and foreign policy.

He said that the EU was setting up a helpdesk for small and medium-sized companies on China-related IP questions, and that IP constitutes an important part of an EU-US economic partnership.

EPO President Alain Pompidou said that Merkel had revived the patent debate. He said the EPO supports the idea of a Community patent, which he called a “sleeping beauty.”

Last Barrier to London Protocol?

Pompidou and others predicted that the London Protocol would be approved by the end of 2007. It has been “dead” in recent years, mainly because France has opposed it. To enter into force, the London Agreement must be ratified by at least eight contracting states, including France, Germany and the United Kingdom, EPO said.

French Senator Richard Yung told Intellectual Property Watch that “hopefully” the protocol would be adopted after the election (6 May) as there was mainly one advisor to President Jacques Chirac who opposes it. Yung said that he had deposited a bill in parliament but it would be up to the government to put it on the agenda.

But he expected it to be adopted by a “strong majority” as two-thirds support it, including conservatives as well as labour, and only the extreme left and right would likely oppose it. Yung said he had talked to one of the candidates, Ségolène Royal, who said she would support it.

Yung expects France to ratify the new version of the 2000 European Convention together with the London Protocol by the end of the year, he said.

Tove Gerhardsen may be reached at tgerhardsen@ip-watch.ch.

Categories: News, English, European Policy, Patent Policy

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Officials: European Patent In Five Years, London Protocol By End Of Year

Leave a Reply