SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • This is certainly a good move, but perhaps this is... »
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    European Patent Office Issues Report On Future, Celebrates Present

    Published on 19 April 2007 @ 5:24 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    By Tove Iren S. Gerhardsen
    MUNICH – The European Patent Office (EPO) has published a report on what the intellectual property rights system may look like in the future, while it celebrates the present and its 30th anniversary this year.

    The celebration was kicked off by a colourful dance and music show on the opening day of the 18-19 April European Patent Forum/PATINNOVA 07. The show was commissioned by the EPO and performed by international artists. It visually raised questions that are increasingly being asked of the intellectual property system, such as what is the correct balance between private and public rights, and the need for resilience and flexibility.

    The European Patent Forum, sponsored by the EPO, and PATINNOVA, sponsored by the European Commission, involved parallel panels and joint plenary sessions. The forum focused on patent systems and PATINNOVA on small and medium-sized enterprises.

    Angela Merkel, German Chancellor and President of the Council of the European Union, visited the event, calling the EPO a “story of success,” referring to the growth in patent applications and members, up from seven original members to 32. “We need to have a robust European patent office,” she said.

    The issue of to whom the EPO is accountable was raised by participants of one of the breakout sessions and may be among the challenges the EPO is facing, along with backlogs in applications and handling time, sources said. EPO President Alain Pompidou said there is an “under-use of patents in Europe.”

    Ian Harvey, chairman of the UK-based Intellectual Property Institute, told Intellectual Property Watch that the rapid growth in patent applications from China is in danger of overwhelming the patent system in Europe, Japan and the United States as currently only 3 percent of these applications are filed outside of China. He said IP activity in China is growing dramatically, with more patent litigation taking place there than anywhere else. He said Germany has trained some 400 specialist IP judges in China, while the European Commission is also involved in similar projects. [Correction: Germany gave most of the technical assistance to set up the IP system in China, but the EU funded the training of the 400 judges, according to Harvey.]

    The EPO report on the future of IP, entitled Scenarios for the Future, is an attempt to address these challenges faced by EPO as well as others in the run-up to 2025, which was set as the time period for the scenarios, sources said.

    Scenarios for the Future has been some two years in the making and involved interviews with some 150 experts from nongovernmental organisations to industry, Pompidou said. It contains four sections: business, geopolitics, society and technology. The EPO said 20,000 copies have been made available for free.

    Konstantinos Karachalios of the EPO told Intellectual Property Watch that there is “a lot of tension” in the patent system at the moment that is also being felt in the EPO, and the Scenarios for the Future project is a reaction to this. He said EPO had decided that the debate would take place in any case and, and if EPO was not proactive, it would not be part in this dialogue.

    Rafael Ramirez of the Said Business School at Oxford University, who has done scenario projects for 27 years and who has been involved in the project, said this was “quite a courageous project” and as good as scenarios could be. He said scenarios are not what you make happen, but what happens to you, and they can help you shape the choices made in the present.

    The report was conducted for the public but parts of the research would also be used internally in EPO, he said. Karachalios said that EPO was somewhat “free” to do this as it is not a political organisation and not part of the European Union, but he recognised that this was a political project.

    The report is “original,” he said. It is a tool for EPO to communicate and debate the future of IP and through it, EPO has built a network as well as expectations. He thus believed this was a “temporary culmination” and that the project would continue.

    Jean-Pierre Contzen, special adviser to the Minister of Science, Technology and Higher Education in Portugal, said on one of the panels that while the scenario report was quite comprehensive, it was not sufficiently proactive and contained an “element of fatality.” He said it would become more important for patent offices to cooperate in the future to face staff challenges.

    In a workshop on the future of IP, issues such as the fight for energy (e.g. oil) and the climate were raised as crucial, along with capitalism and an increase in individual living conditions. James Love of Knowledge Ecology International said he believed collective management of IP would rise in the future, with patents no longer being exclusive. He predicted a change in the system, much like the Internet having gone from being pay-per-minute to a flat fee, and that this model would spread also to biomedicine.

    Separately, a highlight of PATINNOVA 07 was a European Inventor of the Year gala evening and award ceremony was held on 18 April. Professor Marc Feldmann from the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology in London was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award. More information about the winners is available at the EPO’s website.

    Tove Gerhardsen may be reached at tgerhardsen@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.