SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • Congratulations upon re-election;-WHO chief.Priori... »
  • Great article. Ms. Chan may want to read our book ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Inside Views
    Inside Views: WIPO At The Internet Governance Forum: DRMs, Access To Information, And Flexibilities

    Published on 7 November 2006 @ 9:58 am

    Disclaimer: the views expressed in this column are solely those of the authors and are not associated with Intellectual Property Watch. IP-Watch expressly disclaims and refuses any responsibility or liability for the content, style or form of any posts made to this forum, which remain solely the responsibility of their authors.

    Intellectual Property Watch

    At the recent UN Internet Governance Forum in Athens, a World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) representative said there is a “new emphasis on limitations and exceptions to copyright and user rights in areas such as freedom of expression and access to information.” But there is a need to promote interoperability of technology standards in areas such as digital rights management “as a way to avoid fragmentation of the online cultural market and as a way to bridge the digital divide and technological gap in developing countries.”

    “Striking the right balance between rights and public policy goals has been one of the continuous objectives of our member states in negotiating international norms and laws under WIPO’s auspices,” it said, adding that an effort will be made to “empower” all countries to take advantage of the flexibilities in the international legal system and take into account the development dimension of intellectual property.


    Statement of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Geneva, Switzerland

    Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Athens, Greece, October 30 to November 2, 2006

    The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) welcomes the convening of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) stemming from the World Summit on the Information Society. WIPO has taken an active part in all stages of the WSIS and sees this new global initiative as a concrete step to build and further develop international understanding on a range of issues.

    Continued and sustainable growth of the Information Society depends upon an environment of trust and security. Intellectual property (lP) plays a key, if complex, role to encourage creativity, innovation, fostering economic growth in both developed and developing countries. To policy-makers and regulators, the challenge today is to preserve the incentive to create new works and use new technologies to distribute them to users in the face of the huge competitive threat from illicit use of technology by infringers.

    The increasing importance of intellectual property does not necessarily refer to new international rules. Indeed, the international standard for copyright in the digital environment is largely in place already, thanks to the adoption in 1996 of the WIPO Internet Treaties. which have provided legal responses to the challenges of the new digital technologies. The expected adoption in 2007 of the broadcasting treaty would further consolidate this framework.

    This rather means that both lP owners and users need to have confidence that their rights and needs will be observed and that they can properly exercise and exploit intellectual property rules in the new environment. New licensing schemes and rights management models, the increasing development of collaborative initiatives for creating, transmitting and sharing creative content on line, the relationship of intellectual property and technology in areas such as standards and digital rights management (DRM), are examples of these initiatives on the exercise and enforcement of ri!!hts and their connection to teehnology.

    Both individual creators and the creative industries have a great interest in seeing that access to content can take place for as many users and in as many formats as possible. Accessibility, usability, portability are new benchmarks by means of which creative content can be enjoyed continuously. Interoperability will increasingly play a key role in the development of efficient ICT standards and in ensuring that users fully reap the advantages of an interactive environment. This also puts a new emphasis on limitations and exceptions to copyright and user rights in areas such as freedom of expression and access to information. Interoperability of ICT standards will need to be further promoted especially in areas such as digital rights management (DRM), as a way to avoid fragmentation of the online cultural market and as a way to bridge the digital divide and the technological gap in developing countries.

    Striking the right balance between rights and public policy goals has been one of the continuous objectiyes of our member states in negotiating international norms and laws under WIPO’s auspices. Recent member states proposals to introduce in the proposed broadcasting treaty, public interest clauses relating to the defense of competition, the protection of cultural diversity and access to knowledge reflect that concern.

    This balance will continue to be pursued at the international level, while striving to empower all countries to take advantage of the flexibilities that haye been provided in the international legal system and continuously taking into account the development dimension of intellectual property as currently reflected in the ongoing discussions relating to a WIPO development agenda.

    The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) was proposed by WIPO and has become accepted as an international standard for resolviing domain name disputes. It is designed specifically to discourage and resolve the abusiye registration of trademarks as domain names disputes. WIPO’s experience shows that these are heavily concentrated in the .com domain, but attention must also be paid to the establishment of robust preventive mechanisms against abusive registration in new generic top level domains (gTLDs). The UDRP’s popularity stems from its cost-eftectiveness, the predictability of the process and swift enforcement of the results. Frequent users of the UDRP include the entertainment industry, pharmaceutical companies. IT firms and a significant munber of small-to-medium-sized businesses who favor the UDRP over traditional litigation, because they consider it to be a far quicker and cheaper way of protecting their trademark rights against cybersquatting.

    The Internet Domain Name System (DNS) raises a number of challenges for the protection of intellectual property, which, due to the global nature of the Internet, call for an international approach. WIPO has addressed these challenges since 1998 by developing specific solutions., most notably in the First and Second WIPO Internet Domain Name Processes. In particular, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (Center) provides trademark owners with an efficient international mechanism to deal with the bad-faith registration and use of domain names corresponding to their trademark rights.

    The UDRP was adopted by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) on the basis of recommendations made by WIPO in the First WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. WIPO UDRP proceedings have so far involved parties from 131 countries and been conducted in 12 different languages. WlPO has made numerous contributions to help ensure fair and transparent UDRP procedures.

    On a policy level, the Center has used its domain name dispute resolution experience in a report on the IP aspects of introducing gTLDs. This report, which had been prepared at the request of ICANN, recommends the establishment of a uniform mechanism designed to prevent the abusive registration of domain names during the introduction of new gTLDs. Such a preventive mechanism would be in addition to the curative relief option provided by the UDRP.

    The Second WIPO Internet Domain Name Process concerned the relationship between domain names and fivee types of identifiers other than trademarks that had not been addressed in the First WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, namely, International Nonproprietary Names for pharmaceutical substances (INNs), the names and acronyms of international intergovernmental organizations (lGOs), personal names, geographical identifiers and trade names.

    The IGF forum is addressing the implications for policymakers of a world where value lies increasingly in intellcctual rather than physical capital, and where access to knowledge is critical to many spheres of human activity, including human development. Through norm setting, technical assistance, capacity building, technology transfer, WlPO’ s whole range of activities are aimed at buiIding the necessary confidence to support and enhance the Iegitimate economic, cultural and social aspirations of all countries.

    Categories: Inside Views, English

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.