WIPO Members Discuss Tighter Programme and Budget Controls

Published on 6 June 2006 @ 5:20 pm

By William New, Intellectual Property Watch

A key group of member governments of the World Intellectual Property Organization today discussed further ways to tighten their control over WIPO’s budget and administration.

The 6 June informal meeting of the WIPO Programme and Budget Committee (PBC) was a step in a year-long process set up by the 2005 General Assembly (annual meeting of members) to insert member governments more fully into WIPO’s administrative activities following financial and personnel concerns raised last year.

On Tuesday, the committee informally agreed to a proposed mechanism for preparation and follow-up of the programme and budget drafted by the WIPO secretariat, according to participants. There were no substantive changes made to the proposal by the informal committee meeting, and it is expected to be forwarded to the next formal PBC meeting on 11-13 July, they said. That meeting is expected to come up recommendations to the September assembly.

WIPO’s budget currently runs on a two-year basis. The proposed mechanism would change the system in off-budget years to include a presentation to the September WIPO assembly of the internal auditor’s report. Then, in autumn, questionnaires would be distributed to member states to solicit their opinions on priorities for the next two years. In addition, an outline for the coming budget from the WIPO director general would be distributed, with informal consultations on it held in December.

In budget years, changes would include: a review of the revised budget, the previous year’s interim financial report, programme performance reports for the previous year, consideration of inputs from the WIPO Audit Committee and the external auditor, as well as from the internal audit function.

Other additions in budget years would be a review in the September PBC of issues raised by the Audit Committee or Internal Auditor, plus the September assembly’s adoption of the revised budget for the current biennium, and a presentation of the internal auditor’s report.

The PBC receives input from WIPO’s internal audit function, and reports to WIPO’s external auditor, the secretariat and the assembly. The PBC reviews WIPO’s biennial budgets after they are revised, examines the draft programme and budget for the next biennium, making recommendations to the assembly, and acts on recommendations from the WIPO internal auditor and the Audit Committee.

The proposed mechanism “strengthens the involvement of member states in the earlier stages of the design of the draft programme and budget,” according to the secretariat’s note for the informal meeting.

WIPO also said in the preparatory note: “It is evident from the first round of informal consultations that member states would wish to see the PBC engage in more substantive review and discussion of the draft programme and budget, to have greater involvement in its design and to have a greater role in reviewing previous programme performance in preparing programmes for the subsequent biennium.”

The January meeting of the PBC asked the Audit Committee to review a WIPO proposal for a CHF125 million new building construction (IPW, WIPO, January 14, 2006).

Categories: News, English, United Nations, WIPO

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WIPO Members Discuss Tighter Programme and Budget Controls

Related Articles:

Leave a Reply