SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • Congratulations upon re-election;-WHO chief.Priori... »
  • Great article. Ms. Chan may want to read our book ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Centre Highlights Brazil’s Leadership In IP, Free/Open Source Issues

    Published on 22 May 2006 @ 4:25 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    Debates over the intellectual property system, access to knowledge, and free and open source software are raging worldwide, but perhaps nowhere so much as in Brazil. And in that country, one forum for debate and analysis that stands out is the Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) Law School in Rio de Janeiro.

    Located at the FGV Law School is the Center for Technology and Society (CTS), whose core mission is to study the legal, social and cultural consequences of new developments in information and communications technologies.

    The centre, launched in 2003, has projects in intellectual property, access to knowledge, free and open source software, Internet governance, open business models, and privacy.

    “The work the CTS is doing is committed to democracy and development,” Centre Director Ronaldo Lemos said in an interview. When the FGV Law School was created, its primary goal was to “develop research projects that would help to think about Brazilian institutions in a long-term perspective,” he said.

    Intellectual property was one of the first areas at the law school, along with a program on judicial reform in Brazil. “Intellectual property, inasmuch as it is directly connected to access to knowledge, is crucial for the long-term development planning of Brazil, and for the enhancement of the democratic institutions and the public sphere,” Lemos said.

    Lemos is head professor of intellectual property law at FGV Law School, as well as director of Creative Commons Brazil and a member of the board of iCommons, the international Creative Commons project. Lemos earned his LL.B. and LL.D. from the University of Sao Paulo and his LL.M. from Harvard Law School. He is a founder of Overmundo, the largest Web 2.0 initiative in Brazil, and is a member of the Electronic Commerce Commission appointed by the Brazilian Ministry of Justice.

    Others working with the centre include Carolina Rossini, who was a top attorney for the Telefonica Group and the Terra Group in Brazil; and Antonio Cabral, who worked as legal counsel to Globo TV, the largest Brazilian television chain.

    The Creative Commons Brazil project has contributed to the licensing concept’s enthusiastic take-up by artists and non-governmental organisations in Brazil. The Brazilian government also has adopted several initiatives using the Creative Commons model (such as the Education Department’s “publicdomain.gov” portal). Under a Creative Commons license, material may be freely redistributed with few restrictions (such as not making any changes to the text, properly citing the authors, and not for commercial use).

    Another project of the centre is the Free Software Legal Support Group, providing legal support for free software. In addition, the Cultura Livre (Free Culture) project is working to build a dialogue between developing nations on culture, media and intellectual property. It works in a context of the push for a development agenda being sought by Brazil, Argentina and others at the World Intellectual Property Organization, and alternative intellectual property licensing models, according to the centre.

    The A2K (Access to Knowledge) project of the centre promotes research and awareness of the issue from a Brazilian perspective. The project is looking for partners and seeks to include the public interest point of view alongside the private-sector perspective, it said. It is taking into account the WIPO development agenda proposal as well as debates over limitations and exceptions from copyrights for certain groups. The aim is to create awareness and propose amendments to Brazilian copyright law. Another interest is the proposal at WIPO for an Access to Knowledge treaty.

    Open Business, a joint initiative with entities in South Africa and the United Kingdom, is mapping and studying potential business models in which content or services are provided in a free and open fashion. “An open business entrepreneur balances the need to make money with higher professional satisfaction and more socially optimal ways of doing business. Often giving something away for free is the basis of an open business model, rather than making it scarce, controlled and high cost,” the centre said.

    Additional centre projects include a Brazilian government-commissioned study on the regulatory framework of free software; the use of Creative Commons by Trama, Brazil’s biggest recording company (and translation for free distribution of Stanford University professor Lawrence Lessig’s book “Free Culture”), and distance learning law courses.

    Funding for the centre’s projects come from the Ford Foundation, Open Society Initiative, the International Development Research Centre, and the Brazilian government, particularly the Ministry of Science and Technology. The group also has joint projects and partnerships with universities and other centres around the world, such as Yale University (United States), the Creative Commons, the Learning Information Networking and Knowledge (LINK) Centre at the University of the Witwatersand in Johannesburg (South Africa), and the Copy South group at the University of Kent (United Kingdom).

    “In the 21st century, access to knowledge has become paramount for development,” Lemos said. “The Creative Commons is an important contribution in this sense, because it creates a system where the transaction costs for accessing information is very low. And lowering transaction costs make all the difference for development countries.”

    A second role of Creative Commons is “media pluralisation,” the appropriation of technology on the part of the global ‘peripheries’, which is leading to new forms of cultural production, Lemos said.

    “This is a very exciting moment,” he said. “The Creative Commons is an important tool for this content to emerge throughout the established and forthcoming networks, such as the 80 million existing cell phones in Brazil and the digital television, respectively. The Creative Commons can provide the necessary legal framework for these new forms of content to emerge, and be disseminated through old and new media.”

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.