SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Latest Comments
  • So simply put, we have the NABP saying that all ph... »
  • The original Brustle decision was widely criticise... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Snags Over Future Work

    Published on 28 April 2006 @ 11:48 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    Negotiators addressing proposals for the protection of traditional knowledge, traditional cultural expressions (folklore) and genetic resources ran aground over whether to address potentially legal text before completing work on objectives and principles.

    The committee will meet again on 4-12 December 2006, at the halfway point of its two-year mandate. Written comments on the committee activity may be submitted by 31 July.

    The meeting may have been the last in Geneva for lead United States delegate Dominic Keating of the US Commerce Department, who has been tapped to head a new intellectual property enforcement office in New Delhi, India in the coming months, according to sources.

    In this week’s meeting, developed countries, including Canada, Europe, Japan, and the United States, contended with attempts by developing countries led by South Africa (on behalf of all Africa), Brazil and India to make progress on substantive text.

    After a full week of negotiations, from 24 to 28 April, discussions edged into the evening of the last day as a standoff almost led to no conclusion at all. Negotiators needed to stay even after the required United Nations translators were gone home, leading to talks only in English, an occurrence that led France to comment in untranslated French and register its displeasure.

    Officials agreed to a decision on traditional cultural expressions/expressions of folklore that states: “The committee took note of the extensive comments made on the contents of document WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/4, and the indications of a number of delegations that they would be submitting written comments to the secretariat. It was agreed that the question of subsequent steps would be taken up under agenda item 11, Future Work.”

    The committee also took note of other documents in addition to 9/4, but it became the focus of most debate, along with a similar document on traditional knowledge, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/5.

    A secretariat-drafted paper near the meeting’s end proposed to say that the committee undertook “substantive discussions” on genetic resources, even though the majority of the week was spent on traditional knowledge and folklore (which were only “noted” in the secretariat draft), according to sources.

    In addition, the draft contained substantial text on genetic resources including a request that the secretariat prepare an “exploration” of issues related to developing a database or databases for genetic resources in patent examination. But all of this language was dropped after several delegations objected that it did not accurately reflect the week’s debate.

    The biggest disagreement appeared to come on the future work agenda item. The committee members agreed to submit written comments on the traditional knowledge and folklore sections by 31 July, and extended the next IGC to 7 working days. But officials locked horns on whether the written comments should be compiled into a separate document, or integrated into the existing document.

    At the heart of this debate was the desire of Brazil, South Africa and others to include these issues as part of the whole negotiation so that it might lead to a legally binding instrument for the protection of these areas. But Japan, the United States and others are deadset against their inclusion before the completion of talks about principles and objectives which they say would represent a foundation for further discussions.

    Dropped from the future work was a suggestion to submit proposals for an “agreed interim outcome,” as some countries saw it as potentially prejudicing the committee’s work.

    Ill-fated Tie to WTO Work; SCP Defeat?

    Several sources postulated that a reason for the Canadian and US insistence that genetic resources not be overtly excluded from the future work programme is that it is useful for delaying WTO negotiations on the issue if they can continue to say it is being handled elsewhere. A Canadian official did not agree with the suggestion, while a US official acknowledged the link between various bodies, saying the WIPO committee’s work is necessary to inform the other bodies.

    Sources also said that the defeat two weeks ago of a work programme sought by developed countries for the WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of Patents was an undercurrent this week that may have undermined progress. One source likened it to a sports match, with the developed and developing countries now tied at one apiece, with two more matches to go (a proposed treaty on broadcasters’ rights sought by some developed countries and the WIPO development agenda sought by some developing countries).

    But a key developing country source said this week’s outcome was “reasonable,” and that the committee still has a mandate to discuss all issues, including the ones that could lead to a legally binding instrument.

    Earlier in the week, officials also agreed to establish a voluntary fund for the participation of indigenous and local communities.

    In the final minutes of the meeting, the committee found enough agreement to proceed after WIPO Deputy Director General Francis Gurry said he feared “a diplomatic linguistic incident,” according to sources. And the meeting chair, Ambassador I Gusti Agung Wesaka Puja of Indonesia, said that the group appeared to see “the light at the end of the tunnel, but the light might be the train.”

     

    Comments

    1. The Intergovernmental Committee: Ninth Session | WIPO Monitor says:

      […] WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Snags over Future Work […]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.226.207.27