SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • Congratulations upon re-election;-WHO chief.Priori... »
  • Great article. Ms. Chan may want to read our book ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    New US Industry, Government-Backed Centre Promotes Industry View In Developing Countries

    Published on 3 April 2006 @ 12:16 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    A new centre on innovation established at a top law school in Washington, DC is dedicated to promoting acceptance of developed country industry practices in developing countries. The centre is backed by US industry and government, and the UN World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), among others.

    The Creative and Innovative Economy Center was launched on 1 January at the George Washington University Law School. The director of the centre is Michael Ryan, whose contacts in prior positions doing similar work helped him to garner the funding. Ryan has a reputation for representing the US industry perspective in his work in developing countries. In an interview with Intellectual Property Watch, he acknowledged that this is the case.

    “It’s a fair characterisation to say that I am very pro-business,” he said. “I’m very pro-business in developing countries, and I’m very pro-multinational companies.” Ryan argues that multinational companies offer the best way to integrate new knowledge into a country.

    Companies supporting the centre so far include major pharmaceutical companies and associations such as Abbott, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, and Wyeth. Other companies include General Electric, Microsoft, and the News Corporation. In addition, it has support from a variety of universities from across Africa and elsewhere, and funding from the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and WIPO. Significant country-specific funding also is expected from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), Ryan said.

    Ryan said in the interview that the majority of the centre’s funding will come from “public monies,” while the industry contributions will go toward general operations.

    “With the companies, they don’t sign on for us to [do] a particular thing,” Ryan said. “They write a check to us, and with that check then we carry out our whole range of activities. What I basically say to them is, ‘Here’s our agenda, and if you’d like to be a part of that agenda, then help us.’ It’s sort of like being a Baptist minister. We carry on all these missionary works, so the Baptist minister says, ‘Please reach into your pocket and give us support.’

    The basic philosophy for the centre is that a high growth economy “only comes in one way, and that is by having innovation and creativity in your economy,” Ryan said. According to Ryan, the centre’s strategy is to identify key developing countries in each region, find a government official or other person who is friendly to their message (a “champion”), and arrange a meeting with other influential people there. The meetings may be called seminars or roundtables, and are considered by Ryan to be educational. Ryan is expected to do little actual teaching at George Washington, he said.

    “We’re going to release these reports and if we make them useful, if we make them targeted on their concerns, then they will learn from them and decide maybe that there’s things they should model,” Ryan said. He disagreed with the assertion that the centre will directly advise governments, referring instead to its role in offering “educational programmes.”

    Ryan’s vision is that the centre’s work will lead to legislative and policy changes in developing countries in the coming years.

    “I believe it’s the case that five years from now … we will be able to show that in certain countries, laws were changed, policies were changed, activities happened that resulted in growth,” he said. “It’s taken me 10 years to get to this point.”

    The centre may also conduct research and publish reports that can prove politically useful to industry in international negotiations. For instance, at the outset of the February negotiations on a proposal for a development agenda at WIPO, the centre held a roundtable to release its new report touting the success of the IP system in Brazil, which is taking a leadership role in promoting the development agenda.

    The report on biomedical innovation, which countered Brazil’s position in the WIPO negotiations, was presented to invited key government officials and industry supporters (as well as a few journalists) as a side event to the WIPO meeting.

    The centre funds projects from professors and others, and has funding for more than a dozen projects in 2006, Ryan said. It also has signed an agreement with the Max Planck Institute and others at the Munich Intellectual Property Law Centre, as well as a partnership in India, he said. It also is working on other partnerships in Europe and Africa, he said.

    This year, the centre will have studies in key developing countries on music, film, information technology, information and publishing, and software, Ryan said. The message to governments and local industry includes the importance of enforcing intellectual property rights, such as that of foreign firms, he said.

    Ryan has served on the faculties of the University of Michigan School of Business and the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and School of Business. He said his approach fit with the George Washington law school dean’s vision of expanding the school’s presence in developing countries. Ryan’s work has been funded for years by the USAID, USPTO, WIPO and some national governments, especially Jordan, where he has promoted multinational pharmaceutical industry interests.

    Please note: the full interview with Michael Ryan may found on the Intellectual Property Watch website, www.ip-watch.org, in the Inside Views column.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.