U.S. Seeks “High Level” IP Agreements In Middle East

Published on 14 March 2005 @ 9:41 pm

By William New, Intellectual Property Watch

Washington, D.C.–U.S. trade negotiators working toward bilateral free trade agreements with Middle Eastern countries are seeking to maintain the same level of intellectual property rights protection achieved in other bilateral deals, a U.S. trade official said Monday.

“We want to have high standards” on intellectual property, Catherine Novelli, assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Europe and the Mediterranean, said in a telephone press briefing. The agreements the United States has negotiated so far contain “high level” provisions on intellectual property rights, she said, adding, “We would expect these to be the same.”

High quality intellectual property provisions not only benefit the United States, but they are good for those countries that want to be able to attract high-tech, high-quality jobs, she said.

Novelli spoke at the conclusion of the first round of separate bilateral negotiations with Oman and the United Arab Emirates, which she is leading.

She said progress with the two nations was so rapid that they expect to conclude and sign the agreements by year’s end if not sooner. With Oman, agreement has been reached on some aspects of the proposed treaty text tabled by the United States, Novelli said, though she would not specify which areas were under agreement already. Labor provisions also are expected to be the same too, she said.

The larger U.S. goal is to have an overarching regional trade agreement by 2013, and each of the individual bilateral agreements is seen as a step toward that goal. Each agreement turns out differently, depending on the situation of each country. With Egypt, Qatar and Kuwait, expert-to-expert meetings are being held on specific areas, Novelli said, adding that the Bush administration hopes to get approval for its agreement with Bahrain this summer. She did not rule out Israel being part of the agreement eventually.

If the region were counted as a whole, it would be the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner, she said.

The second round with Oman is scheduled for April 18, with the United Arab Emirates in the week to follow.

Categories: Bilateral/Regional Negotiations, US Policy

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

U.S. Seeks “High Level” IP Agreements In Middle East

Related Articles:

Leave a Reply